If you read biographies of Stalin, you will encounter the term “politically correct” routinely in letters to him in the 1930s.
In Marxist terminology “political” is as common as “Allah” in Islamic correspondence. The basic premise of Marxism’s that all value is produced by labor alone. Therefore every good which is consumed by anyone who is not a “worker” or an “intellectual, is taken by force:
“The distribution of goods is a POLITICAL decision.”
— Karl Marx
Until the state of pure communism is reached in the inevitable Marxist history, all relationships, family, company, international, are based on economics, and economics is political. Therefore race relations are based on power alone, so there can be no such thing as a non-white racist because of the overall power relationship between the races.
We hear this all the time from anti-whites. Trotsky had this piece of Marxist theology in mind when he coined the term “racist.”
The only way anybody can have anything, according to Marxism, is to exploit others. The only basis for anybody to have anything in the future “communist” society will be for “intellectuals” to decide that they NEED it: “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”
You could always tell who the Marxist was on discussion shows because they never used the term “Communist” to refer to an existing government. They called all countries which had mine-fields and machine guns on their border to keep people in as “socialist” countries. In Marxist theology, these Progressive countries were in the socialist stage of development, whereas all others, even if they called themselves socialist like Sweden, were in the capitalist phase.
To a Marxist, referring to any country as communist was exactly like a Christian referring to an earthly location as Heaven. Some countries had truly attained the socialist phase of their development toward ultimate communism, and they shot anyone trying to escape to prove it, but there were no Communist states on earth yet.
“SOCIALISM in one country”
— Joseph Stalin
People don’t really know anything abut Marxism, so they do not realize that “nobody has anything they don’t exploit,” “only whites can be racists,” and “political correctness” are straight Marxist concepts from before the Soviet Revolution of 1917.
#1 by Simmons on 01/04/2008 - 11:20 am
Speaking of the political, as for election 08 its my prediction that this is the last election cycle in which PC as we know it is the determinant for the etiquette. After Peak Oil and the economic implosion hit in 09 we go one of two ways or both at the same time Zimbabwe etiquette or Mantra etiquette. The Marxism as we know it of screaming adolescents hopped up on Mommy Prof’s kool-aid trying to intimidate the feminine into obedience or the feckless father figure into wild spending will be challenged severly. As I literally tell every rube I meet, “Do we really need more Politcal Correctness?”
#2 by Dave on 01/04/2008 - 12:02 pm
The portion of non-Caucasian world that has dark colored skin will never have any notion whatsoever of the technical platform that economically supports their lives.
This technical platform steadily evolves based mostly upon innovations coming from Caucasians, but not entirely.
But the important point is that it is only in the Caucasian world that thinking tends to keep up with the evolving technical platform.
Marxism is so durable in the dark colored skin world because it provides an easily understood explanation for the inferiority of dark colored skinned peoples. The Negro mind, for example, simply cannot comprehend the technical platform. It can comprehend, however, an explanation for white dominance that furnishes a sense of entitlement to dark colored skinned people.
That house spider that you see in the corner of your closet is a vulgar creature. Nevertheless, it INSISTS upon being. That is the nature of life. Correspondingly, dark colored skinned people are going to INSIST upon entitlement. Count on it and don’t be so stupid as to imagine that, in their own minds, they believe they have an alternative.
And there never will be an empty bed in any prison or any venue that furnishes the basic supports of life: food and shelter. For example, it just flummoxes me how people can be so blind not to see that black males (and many white males too) commit crimes for the very purpose to getting INTO jail.
If you want to deter crime, remove the incentive: Charge room and board. No money, no bed, no heat, no food. And if the prisoner or his family has no money, let the Catholic Church (or other religious institutions) be challenged for furnishing charity. That is a good role for the Catholic Church (or other religious institutions).
But alas, our black robed geniuses, our guardians of the Constitution cannot allow that.
They are too busy furnishing incentives for criminals to attack their own families (which is what most crime really is) and to attack the public. And also they are too busy furnishing denials that they themselves are structurally part and parcel of a system that supports criminal acts for the purpose of supporting the industries revolving around the criminal justice system and its police and jailers public employee unions and the taxpayer largesse they receive.
So don’t think Marxism is not going to persist. It has already proved way too durable and that is not for any trivial reasons.
#3 by Dave on 01/04/2008 - 12:58 pm
Great quote by Johann Goethe:
“Most men only care for science so far as they get a living by it, but they will worship error when it affords them a subsistence.”
#4 by YearningForFreedom on 01/05/2008 - 2:11 am
Don’t pretend that this doesn’t sound good:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtU3vUOa2sw
#5 by backbaygrouch4 on 01/05/2008 - 7:42 am
Re: Dave. Your anti-Catholic bilge, and it is that despite the cutesy “and other religious institutions” Catskill comedic attempt, is the sort of diversion that negates what Bob is trying to do. If you want a cheap shot, try this: one proof of the inferiority of Blacks is that they are almost entirely Protestant and the only reason they aren’t Jews is that Jews won’t have them. If Whites are to survive they cannot be divided. Get with the program.
#6 by shari on 01/05/2008 - 10:35 am
Some things can sound so moving, that it’s hard to contradict. The Soviet Anthem made me think of that scene in TLOTRs where Sauruman reveals his huge army to Crema, sp?, and he sheds tears.
“The way IS broad that leads to destruction.” But, it’s good that we, at least, have the fall of the soviet union, to look back on and encourage us.
#7 by Pain on 01/05/2008 - 1:05 pm
Just think of the 80 million of the Soviet Union’s own people that Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin murdered.
No wonder the USSR collapsed.
#8 by shari on 01/05/2008 - 5:47 pm
I thought about that, Pain. I hope it’s not the same again, but I don’t know. It is obvious that great, rousing, anthems and parades are terribly false.
I’m not convinced that the ancient race of Israelites is totally extinct. I also don’t believe that the state of Israel is any prophetic thing. I mull these things over, but I don’t see much. Why are we still talking about jews? Why is it like this?
I stay interested in Whitaker because I’m convinced that this is where the fight is. I also agree with Backbay that we must stick together. I left trying to be Catholic because I found nothing but PC. But, I think that Catholic, Protestant divides will be reconciled no matter what good reasons caused them in the first place. And I think that the survival of our race is right.
I might also say that I think Dave is right about “charging room and board.” Charity should be uncoerced and local. That’s all I’ll say about that.
#9 by AFKAN on 01/08/2008 - 2:42 pm
Some good points in this thread, and Shari’s needs to be dealt with first.
Shari wrote:
in reply:
In practice, you can not deal with the issue of Race without understanding how the most effective Race on the planet – at least, in terms of representing their group interests successfully – actually pulls this off.
All too many of the supporters of the White Race proudly announce they are White, and act as if they have actually done something important.
My response to each of them is the same:
“And…?”
Every Jew awakens with their One Commandment to guide all of their actions in thought, word and deed – “Is It Good For JEWS?”
White people have not become to come close to this.
What we did, we did for our Families, and only incidentally, for our Race.
This narrow focus, while correct as a foundation, misses the larger issues: Family, as the microcosm of Race, and Race, as the macrocosm of Family, AND Race as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture.
Jews define ALL issues in the larger context of the One Commandment; this, pretty much alone, is responsible for their Racial success.
That’s why the one group that can NOT organize along Racial lines is the White Race; all others – Jew, Negro, Hispanic, Asian – are encouraged to do so by all too many local, state and federal agencies, with the total organizational support of the Jews.
To paraphrase Burnham, and Metzger, we let it happen…
you wrote:
in reply:
The Catholic-Protestant divides are being bridged, even as we speak; the split in the Anglican Church is leading many to reconsider Roman Catholicism, for example, and talks are well underway for a Reconciliation of the two.
The Ultimate Battle is the survival of our Race, and the expansion of our Race; to the extent Christian Institutions do not actively support this, in time, they will wither away.
you wrote:
in reply:
It is an unmentioned secret of the corrections system that many of its members are doing life of the time plan – one year here, two years there, ninety days here (especially when it turns cold!) – you get the idea.
In short, for all of their self-serving statements of how they want to be “free,” the point is, they are literally incapable of acting as positive members of the larger society.
In short, people who can make freedom work, don’t want the inmates, because, while they want to be “free,” they can NOT make freedom work in their own lives, much less the larger society.
As well, the inmates live much better as inmates than they do on the outside; free room and board, free unlimited medical care, free basketball – you name it.
And THAT is why the correctional system has a return rate of 85%.
It’s not “just like home.”
It IS “Home.”
#10 by Pain on 01/08/2008 - 6:59 pm
For Shari:
Extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof.
The Jews today claim to be the untainted direct descendants of the Judeans of the Bible from 2000-4000 years ago and on this extraordinary claim they make other extraordinary claims on Palestine and the whole world.
But these extraordinary claims are given no proof at all.
Indeed research by Jews such as Arthur Koestler prove that more than 85% of modern Jewish genes come from ancient Khazaria.
Since you say you believe the Bible, what does it say about the matter? The Old Testament and the Gospels say not one stone would be left on another in Jerusalem, and that the Jews would be totally devastated and scattered forever abroad.
We know that Judea is a desert and could support a very small population. But there were 7,000,000 Jews in the Roman Empire, almost all proselytes, which means they were Gentiles by birth. About them, Matthew 23:15 says: “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.”
History further teaches us that long before the fall of Constantinople, these Jews — Gentile by race — had almost disappeared, being converted to Christianity. History also tells us about these that were left, the hardcore, those Gentiles who had converted to Judaism in order to spite Christ.
The end result is that even for the 15% who are not Khazarian by descent, it would be a far stretch to claim that they were descendant from genetic Judeans of the Bible.
Too much time has passed.
And there is no evidence.
On prophecy, Revelation itself mentions the matter at least twice, in 2:9 and 3:9, the last of which reads: “Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.”
For your friends and family who are influenced by Dispensationalism, know that NO branch of Christianity believed anything like this until the 1880s, during the rise of Zionism. The Protestant view of the Reformation, for example, “Reformed eschatology” allows no possibility for it. The curtain in the temple was ripped, the covenant was completely, FULfilled in Christ at his first coming, not the second.
This is why there can be only one people of God, not two. The people of God are they who once looked forward to his first coming, and they who believe that he already came. Thus no Jew is of the people of God. Those who hate Christ, do not have a “special blessing” — ALL nonbelievers are enemies of God, especially Jews, since they still willfully reject the covenant.
In any case extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof, but no proof is given.
#11 by shari on 01/08/2008 - 10:22 pm
Pain, I can understand that to claim an untainted direct descent in order to claim Palestine doesn’t hold water. Many are atheist, anyway. I was meaning that, I don’t know if such jews are extinct. I simply don’t know.
As for jews willfully rejectng the covenant, some don’t know that. My younger daughter was close friends with a jewish girl during grade school and jr. high. She told my daughter that she hated being jewish, but of course this was her family. She wasn’t devious or manipulative.
Afkan, I am not concerned about highlevel talks to unite Protestants and Catholics, I just mean that honest Christians not being divided by those things