I was reading a Stormfront thread where people were ripping each other to pieces over whether “illegal drugs were compatible with the WN lifestyle.”
I caused me to realize something important:
“This thread and Religiout has taught me something.”
“As with the Religious threads, we tear each other apart over non-racial questions like drugs and religion.”
“The very term Nationalism implies a form of Wordism. If you form a nation, you fight over everything besides religion.”
“This thread has taught me that I am NOT a White Nationalist, I am a white SURVIVALIST.”
“‘Nation’ be damned. I am trying to save my RACE.”
#1 by Tim on 05/03/2006 - 12:33 pm
I like that term –“white survivalist”. I stopped calling myself a White Nationalist quite a while ago. I know use the term “white racist”. You are right tho—white nationalism is wordism. I never realised that before. Wordism must go.
I don’t think white racist can be construed as wordist. I am probably more along the lines of White Survivalists now that you mention it. In fact, I like “White Survivalist” better. No one has any idea what that is!! Everyone knows —or THINK they know what a White Racists is supposed to be about. A White Survivalists is a new concept. Chalk another one up to BW.
When someone asks what the hell a white survivalists is??? I can hit them the magic lines:
“Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
“They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.”
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
“AND ALL THESE FACTS MAKES ME A WHITE SURVIVALIST”
#2 by Shari on 05/03/2006 - 1:16 pm
I used to have this mistaken idea that “melting pot” simply meant that frictions in Europe didn’t matter here anymore. You could be Irish on your mother’s side and English on your father’s and no one cared anymore except as a topic of conversation. Even Catholic,Protestant divisions weren’t strong where I grew up. I have cousins,aunts and uncles on both sides. Most white Americans have more than one ethnic strain in their background and yet in no way consider themselves “mixed.” I think that white survival actually is the issue.
#3 by Dennis on 05/04/2006 - 8:33 am
I’m not a White Nationalist, I only support them because they do not oppose my race.
I do not belong to a ‘movement’ or a ‘group. I am a white person. I am looking after myself, and I stand by any other white person who has the same goals as me. They are my allies.
White Nationalism, white Survivalism, whatever you want to call it. It is NOT about politics or ideology. It is personal. It is about an individuals right to secure his or her likeness on the planet.
When you boil it down, it really comes down to that.
When you strip away the extraneous labels, and describe this movement for what it really is, no one can oppose rationally.
There is nothing you can say to someone against them wanting to preserve their likeness without it being hateful. There is nothing anti’s can say about us not having the right to preserve our race which wouldn’t appear hateful or genocidal.
Because anti-racists ARE racist, and genocidal. Define yourself by words, you defend the words and words are easy targets. BUT define the movement by YOU as an individual, and you are defending yourself.
This makes it much harder for anti’s to attack, and quite frankly it makes for a more HONEST debate.