The genetic urge is an urge to perpetuate OUR KIND, people who LOOK LIKE US.
Take a look at this “no borders” crap and then take a look at nature. A bird or a monkey will allow a different kind of bird or monkey to cross its borders with no problem. But if an INTERBREEDABLE type comes on its ground, there’s a fight.
This is EXACTLY what the Wordist always told us that nature did NOT do.
Nothing is more of a violation of nature than the idea of Humanity.
The sea change article Elizabeth talked about, by Rushton and Jensen, shows why this won’t work. It was published mainline, which is one hell of a breakthrough, and it shows how a race is a FAMILY. People tend to marry people who look like them, even when they cross the sea.
The battle which produced us was a battle between interbreedable groups.
You can talk your throat raw and make whites defenseless, but Hispanics are going to fight for Hispanis, blacks for black. You would be astonished if am Oriental did not take an insult to orientals far more personally than he would an attack on Australian aborigines.
When someone says something negative about Jews, what group do you expect to lead the charge against them?
Jews, of course.
Only whites are not supposed to react this way.
Nobody, but NOBODY takes this “mankind” crap seriously unless they’re talking about white people.
In all of nature, the battles are between INTERBREEDABLE groups.
Get up to date.
The time is past when a Marx could say that all human class distinctions are artificial results of economics. Now we know that class is alive and well in every social animal.
The days of the sweet little chimpanzee munching on his grass and puzzsling over the violence of man are OVER. We have seen them tear monkeys to pieces and eat the,
GET OVER THE OUTDATED CRAP.
Leave Humanity in the past where it belongs, and join us in the new millennium.
#1 by Shari on 05/17/2006 - 5:02 pm
I read a statement some time ago, by I don’t know who, but I think it is a good summery of the situation. Individuals of different races can and often do get along fine, but whole races CANNOT.
#2 by Dennis on 05/18/2006 - 4:02 am
Shari, I think there is a rational explanation for this, and it has to do with
emergence. Emergence is the term given to the phenomenon where the whole is
greater than the sum of the parts. In races, this accounts for why you cannot
tell the behaiviour of a race from an individual. Each individual has a nature
which deals with other individuals, and with groups. When you get a group of
people, of the same race, you begin to see interactions between them emerge that
were not evident. Essentially, groups of people bring out behaiviours that were
not seen when the individuals were scattered. Obvoious really, but it applies
to race. Some racial characteristics become evident only in groups.
Bob, this comment is a very good one. I have always wondered whether this
‘global conciousness’ really exists, and whether it is just a figment of
imagination for a few wishful thinking whites. It became evident many years
ago, this was indeed the case.
Nature is geared for us to produce offspring OF OUR OWN TYPE, not another.
This cannot be stressed enough. It is not for species, not even for race or
genus. We mate, we look after our children so our own likeness can live in.
Those who do this, survive and thier success passes on. Those that choose not
to, and it is only humans that choose not to, as essentially going against
nature, and ensuring that thier likeness doesn’t pass on.
#3 by Elizabeth on 05/18/2006 - 10:40 am
I caught something on cable a year or so ago about a major catastrophic
eruption in Indonesia 70,000 years ago. (I don’t remember even
the name of the channel, but it was probably something on one
of the DISCOVERY channels.) According to the program, this
eruption was so devastating that (1) it wiped out most of the
human population and (2) because it wiped out most of the human
population, it is the major reason why there was never enough
genetic drift to prevent humans from being interbreedable.
Those stories about looking for bone marrow donors are VERY
interesting, especially after decades of “All humans are
alike and race is an illusion.” Minority groups are mobilizing
to get their people out to get tested because – surprise – DNA
can be DIFFERENT. Not everyone can donate to everyone else
and folks of different colors often
have enough different DNA factors that they can’t donate
between racial groups.
#4 by Antonio Fini on 05/18/2006 - 1:50 pm
I remember an episode the Montel Williams show where they sought to prove little kids learn racism from their parents. If not for bad environmental influences, we would all grow up the same and love eachother.
They invited some redneck racists and their kids onto the show and put the little White kids in a room with the little Black kids. Lo and behold, after a few minutes these cute 8 year olds were playing with eachother, heedless of their racial differences.
It was undeniably slick. What they forgot to mention is the scientific fact that kids don’t consider racial differences until puberty. In other words, till they reach the age of interbreedability. Then race becomes the driving force behind sex selection and social group formation.
This is probably how White people came about in the first place, self selecting their phenotype from lighter skinned members of the breeding group. Man’s preference for lighter skinned females holds true for all races. The word Aryan simply means noble- those who stand apart from the group.
How else would distinct Black and White races exist after 400 years of cohabitation on the same continent?
#5 by Dennis on 05/19/2006 - 3:55 am
Actually, the ability to distinguish between races varies from race to race. Northern European children, and by children I mean infants who are too young to be indoctrinated, reacted more favourable to unfamiliar faces (those faces of a different ‘type’), whereas it was noted that the Jewish infacts became much more upset.
I think some degreee of recognition is present, and it has been observed. Other studies have been done, which show the opposite of Montel Williams. Don’t forget, that this is a TV show, and they are not after the objective truth, but rather they are trying to force a point.
#6 by Bob on 05/19/2006 - 11:54 am
Montel Williams is married to a white woman, of course.
#7 by Bob on 05/19/2006 - 11:56 am
Actually, small children will very happily play with monkeys and dogs.
When I was an infant, I was found playing with a rattlesnake.
My prejudiced parents wouldn’t let me play with it because they said this interspecies friendship was dangerous.
They were right.
The snake died.
#8 by kane on 05/19/2006 - 4:22 pm
Come to think of it, a bird and monkey wouldn’t allow anything to cross its territory, breedable or not, same subspecies, or not. Of course a black man is closer to a white man than a cow is to a white man, but a black man still is not a white man.
#9 by Bob on 05/19/2006 - 10:46 pm
KANE:
Come in Mars!
Have you ever alked under tree where a bird was chirping?
He was chirping to mark his territory.
Did he attack you?
He would have attacked abird of the same species ifit was where you were.
Got it?
Why do people work so HARD to get things wrong?
#10 by Elizabeth on 05/21/2006 - 2:06 pm
I’ve had a doctor tell me that newborns exhibit racial traits
of behavior even in the delivery room.
#11 by Dennis on 05/22/2006 - 4:18 am
Yes, humans, all animals, are wired to recognize genetic kin. Being able to recognise kin allows one to determine that value an individual has to us. Individual more closely related, carry more of your genes, so in the animal kingdom, animals tend to favour and be more willing to protect those who share a greater part of their genetic interest.
The inherit racial familiarity and discrimination only serve to show that humans too, have this.
Nature build creatures so they can perpetuate their own. Creatures that voluntarily do the OPPOSITE are against nature.