FIRST UP, YOU LEAVE OUT THE SENTENCE ABOUT “ASSIMILATION, I.E. INTERMARRIAGE.”
NO WORSE MISTAKE IS POSSIBLE.
There are already plenty of breeding nonwhites in our cutnries to destroy our race. The WORST thing that could happen is if immigratin were suddenly cut off and everybody decided the problem was solved.
Assimilation, INTERMARRIAGE, is the threat, not LIBERALS.
Can ANYBODY hear me out there?
Lord Nelson
OK, I think I can improve this further but please read and let me know what you think.
The British mantra:
“Our politicians and our media keep telling us there is RACISM. Their SOLUTION, to this RACISM, is for the third world to pour into EVERY white country, and ONLY into white countries.”
Britain and the Netherlands are crowded just like Japan and Taiwan, but our politicians and media don’t demand that Japan and Taiwan must end RACISM, by bringing in millions of Africans, Bangladeshis, etc., and assimilating with them.”
Our politicians and media demand the final solution to RACISM, is for mass non-white immigration into ALL white countries, and ONLY, into white countries.
What if I said there is RACISM, and this RACISM can only be solved with mass non-blacks immigration into ALL black countries, and ONLY, into black countries????
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about RACISM? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK race.
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this, and what kind of LIBERAL black man would agree to this????
“But if you tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against the white race, our politicians and media agree that you are a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they REALLY are is anti-white.”
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
Comment by Lord Nelson
ME:
I agree with a commenter that the word LIBERAL is out of place here. I said “sane,” but the removal of either adjective would do just as well. But you’re the Brit, not me.
I LIKE “Britain and the Netherlands are crowded just like Japan and Taiwan, but our politicians and media don’t demand that Japan and Taiwan must end RACISM, by bringing in millions of Africans, Bangladeshis, etc., and assimilating with them.”
But does that let them talk about white countries with low birth rates in Eastern Europe? You have to TRY it to find out. On Stormfront, Prometheus kept hitting someone who used this dodge to say,
“So this makes genocide OK?”
“The argument is that anti’s seek non-whites to enter ALL and ONLY white nations.
You didn’t READ the mantra. If you did, you would have got the point of it.”
“Anti-racists come here, and they all argue ONE thing. That the white race must go. That the white race must go by means of their beloved multiracialism.”
“The anti-racists agree, that despite the facts, this must happen. White nations MUST go multiracial.”
“You see, it makes no difference whether the Netherlands is more crowded, THE most crowded, or the LEAST crowded. The argument for anti-white multiracialism will remain the same.”
“Case in point.”
“Anti-racists will argue that race doesn’t exist, so white people have no logical argument against multiracialism.”
“Anti-racists, upon being shown that race DOES exist (many still haven’t caught up, but for those that do), they argue that the white race should assimilate non-whites so as to stop inbreeding (a blatant mistruth) and improve the genetic pool.”
“Whether race exists or not, the argument is the same. It is for multiracialism in WHITE nations.”
“Whether white nations are declining or not, the argument is the same. Whether they are crowded or not, the argument is the same.”
“The crux of the matter is this. Why with all this variation in understanding of facts is the only thing that anti’s seem to be consistent on, is that ALL and ONLY white nations MUST become multiracial nations.”
“That is the point of the mantra.”
“Now I ask you this, why is it that anti-racists are consistent ONLY in demanding that WHITE nations and white nations only become multiracial?”
ME:
As you can see, a Prometheus doesn’t just concentrate on the anti’s argument. He uses it to slam his point home. So your effectiveness MAY depend on YOUR ability to do that.
#1 by lyulf on 04/17/2007 - 5:24 pm
Intermarriage works on some.
I prefer miscegenation.
Works on everbody. Shocks ’em too.
#2 by The Swedish Guy on 04/17/2007 - 5:40 pm
First I would like to express my appreciation of the fact that the topic of *wording of the Mantra outside America* is raised.
Then I would like to thank for and comment on the alternative mantras that has been suggested by Adelheim and Lord Nelson.
Adelheim:
“Everybody talks about immigration, integration, multiculture and assimilation.”
The word “Everybody/Everyone” is good because it’s easy but not good because it fails to identify the political establishment we are looking to critizise (wrong spelling?).
“immigration, integration, multiculturalism and assimilation” is too complicated. We lose both speed and punch here. The words are perhaps too difficult too, especially assimilation (a word we probably should not use anyway as discussed in this blogpost). I am looking for a mantra so easy that even a child can understand it.
The problem I have with the mantra is not to explain it but to explan it in one or two easy sentences. We must not expand on the mantra but keep it short and easy. If we expand on the mantra
we will destroy it and make it unusable. It’s long enough in it’s original form. The shorter the mantra is, the harder it is to write.
“They say this would lead to the melting-pot. The melting-pot is the idea that all races will be mixed.”
This is pretty good! It’s a good substitute for “the RACE problem”. The expression “melting-pot” is seldom used in Sweden though.
——————————————————————
Lord Nelson:
“For the UK. I would change the words “liberals and respectable conservatives” to “Government and media””
If we say “The Government” we exclude one half of the two sides-industry: the fake opposition, left or right, who are the current benchwarmers. “the media” is borderline complicated too. It’s way easier to see politician bias than media bias.
“Of course other words may have to be changed in order to make those two words fit.
Maybe:
The government and the media keep telling us there is this RACE, problem.
The government and the media says this race problem will only be solved……….etc.”
Do they speak of the RACE problem in UK?
———————————————————————————————–
The riddle remains unsolved. I have a draft of my own but I am also dissatisfied. I used Adelheim’s melting pot argument and used diversity instead, a very commonly used word in Sweden. It’s a bit hard to talk about a “diversity problem” though.
DRAFT:
“Everyone says we have to have diversity. This diversity will come about when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan must have diversity by bringing in millions of third worlders and integrating with them.”
“Everyone says the final solution to this problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “integrate” with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this problem and this problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a diversity problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, both the political left and right agree that I am a nazi.”
“They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.”
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
#3 by The Swedish Guy on 04/17/2007 - 5:51 pm
Wow! I just got hold of this additional suggestion from Lord Nelson. VERY VERY NICE! It’s excellent. How much?? ;D
I AM VERY PLEASED!!!!!!!!
LORD Nelson:
“Our politicians and our media keep telling us there is RACISM. Their SOLUTION, to this RACISM, is for the third world to pour into EVERY white country, and ONLY into white countries.”
Britain and the Netherlands are crowded just like Japan and Taiwan, but our politicians and media don’t demand that Japan and Taiwan must end RACISM, by bringing in millions of Africans, Bangladeshis, etc. and assimilating with them.”
Our politicians and media demand the final solution to RACISM, is for mass non-white immigration into ALL white countries, and ONLY, into white countries.
What if I said there is RACISM, and this RACISM can only be solved with mass non-blacks immigration into ALL black countries, and ONLY, into black countries????
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about RACISM. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK race.
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this, and what kind of LIBERAL black man would agree to this????
“But if you tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against the white race, our politicians and media agree that you are a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they REALLY are is anti-white.”
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
#4 by Stevenp on 04/17/2007 - 7:33 pm
How about this version I’m currently testing. It includes an added introductory paragraph that I have found to be very useful in disarming the reader before he dives into the mantra itself:
Bob’s Mantra:
PeeCee religious doctrine goes something like this:
“If you go against your group interests while black you’re an uncle tom, if you do so while white you’re open-minded. Amen. If you express group interests while black you’re standing up for your people, if you do so while white you’re racist. Amen.”
The PeeCee fanatics that dominate government, academia and media keep telling us there is a problem with white people and white countries. The problem, it appears, is that they are too racist. They keep saying this problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says there is a problem with asian people and that this problem will be solved by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this problem with white people and white countries is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this problem with black people and black countries and this problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a problem with black people being too racist, I am talking about MY race hatred of black people and MY desire to drive them into extinction?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of demographic extinction against my people, white people, the PeeCee fanatics agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white racists.
Anti-racist has become a code word for anti-white racist.
http://www.nationalsalvation.net/
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/
#5 by Lord Nelson on 04/17/2007 - 8:14 pm
[hmmm. Sprung from Akismet.]
Test flight.
OK, I agree with the coach about the important point of “assimilation”
However its the early hours of the morning here now, so to try and get more feedback, I have tinkered with a couple of things then posted it on OV at Stormfront to see if any of our resident antis take the bait.
Hopefully while I am sleeping they will be given it a good work over, and we can see if we have a useful catch in the morning.
I think we can make this closer to Bobs original while keeping the changes important for the Brits.
Thanks for all the feedback, and there is always room for continued changes and improvement.
Lets remember the REALL impotant thing is, MAINSTREAM FORUMS.
The first test flight for the British mantra is here:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/racism-381396.html
#6 by Sys Op on 04/18/2007 - 2:08 am
COPY from prior post
———————-
Possible suspenders to go with the tech team’s new belt:
https://www.blogbackuponline.com/techrigy/
Love the new changes!
Comment by AFKAN — 4/17/2007 @ 10:25 pm
———————-
Yes Sir. I’ve not used any of these. Each BEST (Blog Editing Specialist Team) member should have the login and password. This WP install already has a great plugin and it is being done every day (since the 10th), but it really needs to be on two other people’s computers. I’m assuming this blog will have a function that allows that once it’s been backed up. I have the addresses of three techs… but it really must be done every DAY. Even with Brit & Swede time, people aren’t posting past 2 or 3:00AM CST.
This has to be a Daily at best and a Weekly at worst. The reason the blog was having all the problems was NOT WordPress. It was a hosting server error that was causing the SQL to not take new types of data and clear what should have been cleared. I’m surprised it worked at all, TBH. If it had been corrupted on a real server crash it would have all been gone. Almost 3 year’s worth in May to be exact.
It’s that kind of commitment that Dave succinctly described:
I have all the info for the service now. It is enabled for its daily backup for the time it set for itself, 5:54 AM. It has an Export feature, but it comes in as an XML, which is good for some things, but I prefer the sql.gz or .zip (especially for a night like last night where a fatal error means using a direct pullback from an SQL file you make before you start anything — fortunately, I didn’t have to use it).
NICE site. Some eyes/ears open 24/7 makes for great efficiency and protection. The web’s a bit large now.
email using Javascript to avoid spam scrapers. Just click it.
By the way… thank you, AFKAN
samizdat
Comment by Sys Op — 4/17/2007 @ 10:45 pm
—
#7 by The Swedish Guy on 04/18/2007 - 3:43 am
To StevenP:
“How about this version I’m currently testing. It includes an added introductory paragraph that I have found to be very useful in disarming the reader before he dives into the mantra itself:
Bob’s Mantra:
PeeCee religious doctrine goes something like this:
“If you go against your group interests while black you’re an uncle tom, if you do so while white you’re open-minded. Amen. If you express group interests while black you’re standing up for your people, if you do so while white you’re racist. Amen.””
It’s well-written but too defensive perhaps and waters down the mantra with extension in text.
But maybe it works, I don’t know.
“The PeeCee fanatics that dominate government, academia and media keep telling us”
Too long. Loses speed and punch.
“there is a problem with white people and white countries. The problem, it appears, is that they are too racist. They keep saying this problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
Pretty good! But leftists are always complaining about Israel being racist too but you don’t hear anything about Israel having to have third world immigration to solve the racism problem. Yes, Israel it not a white country but the left says it’s racist and according to this mantra complaints about racism seem to be directed only at white nations. This may be a problem with Lord Nelsons latest piece too…
“Anti-racist has become a code word for anti-white”
It didn’t become, it always was.
#8 by Stevenp on 04/18/2007 - 10:35 pm
Great points Swedish Guy.
Don’t worry about the intro pargraph – think of it as a detachable module you may or may not add to soften it when necessary. Note you’re not softening the mantra itself, you’re softening the reader to prepare them for the mantra.
You’re absolutely right regarding that first line being too long. I’m a bit too tired right now to think up an alternative – I’ll let you know later.
Don’t worry about leftists and Israel – they think of Jews as whites. Which is kind of funny, I mean Jews pull the “anti-semitism! anti-semitism!” race card so often it’s amazing people still let them switch identites from white to semite, semite to white, white to semite non-stop.
As far as I’m concerned if you insist you’re a semite, fine you’re a semite. Except you don’t play games with me pal; now you STAY a semite.
In addition, you’ll note that the range of argument is from (right wing) palestinians must go to (left wing) there should be a two-state solution, i.e. apartheid.
The one-state solution (multi-culturalism) is NOT on the leftist map. Noam Chomsky needed bodyguards when he went to a campus to do a speech on it. It’s a strictly radical left concept pioneered by one man, Israel Shamir (www.israelshamir.net), whose close ties to Sweden may mean his influence there is stronger, I don’t know. In any case, I assure it you has no currency anywhere but radical left circles.
Anyway, if they insist Israel is a non-white country that is also harangued for racism (thereby invalidating our “ONLY white countries” part), ask them what their solution is. A two-state solution means separation. Why? Because Jewish civilization is valuable? Because it must be preserved? Ok so what you’re saying is it’s only whites who need to go, right? Etc.