B. U. G. S.

SysOp check this out:

In order to draw those 2000 visitors I’ve made 112 posts all over the net. Actually many more because extreme tracker consolidates all hits from some domains under one referrer. See the page called Referrer Tracking 2 for the full list.

Guess what such a high number of inbound links did to my google rank for “anti-white racist”: Google search

Number 2 after one month’s work. Pretty amazing isn’t it?

This suggests there is a very important side-effect to cutting out the intermediate activism platform. Getting activists to send traffic directly to the main websites may well result in a TREMENDOUS boost in google rankings for a whole slew of keywords at both blog and NS.

Comment by Stevenp — 5/16/2007 @ 8:07 pm |Edit This

AHAHAHAHAHAHA,

I love it. You’ve just done because it WORKS exactly what people in e-commerce/SEO get paid for day after day after day. But they don’t have NEARLY as much fun, or have the same GUT purpose as you and the others who use blogs and forums.

If you begin to put articles (250 words or so of verbiage) content pages up… that will only skyrocket and you’ll become one stop shopping for the Movement, and you and Dave control the content. If they link NS, that will do the same thing for Dave’s stats.

We’ll see what happens. All the social bookmarking will now become instrumental…. but a video will do more than anything else around.

The top SEO gurus and marketers are paying huge money to do it.

What I’m doing in my arena is making people blanch. They stop, and have nothing to say. I bat my baby blues and say when they can help me solve my problem, please come tell me.

One older gentleman winked and smiled the entire day — it wasn’t no come on, I’ll clue you.

Phenomenal.

REMEMBER, Stevep, your links with – /?xyz – ARE showing up on SiteMeter… it’s not a failure. I have all mine there on WOL tests. Extreme won’t do it we found, so we’re moving to a tracker that will.

If you get links and crosslinks TO WOL and NS, then that’s good. They have to have a way to GET here. The more links and places that other activists put up on their own, adding to on their own and cross-linking to each other is good. 250 words per posted article. Things run 250 to 500, but 500 is considered overkill unless it’s a technical or definition-heavy article. As NS has done, you link related articles into “funnels” or “silos” as the newer lingo is developing. Dave’s “funnels” are his upper menu/tab bars. All his links funnel links show on every page of that funnel’s articles. But, that’s NOT necessary; you link using TEXT ANCHORS within your articles to a related themes or definitions.

Comment by Sys Op

POINTER: I am putting StevenP’s longer, EARLIER message last because it is long and complicated. This is a technical point on MY end, as a writer: You need to envision the READER and arrange your message for HIM or HER:

Thanks Bob and SysOp – I’ve recorded your incoming hits from that testing blog. Unfortunately the test failed because the hits are reported coming from http://mantra7777test.blogspot.com/ period. I was hoping the modified URL (with the question mark) would show up somehow.

Ok here’s a tough one for you SysOp (because if you can’t answer it no one can). Please read the scenario below – I’d appreciate your thoughts on the parts marked *magic*.

Scenario –

The landing page is: http://whitakeronline.org/

There are two activists: A1 and A2.

Each activist has their own unique URL to send traffic to:

A1 uses http://whitakeronline.org/?A1
A2 uses http://whitakeronline.org/?A2

A1 goes to forum.com and posts the mantra. At the end of the mantra he adds the link http://whitakeronline.org/?A1

Fifty people read the mantra and five become curious enough to click A1’s link so whitakeronline.org’s tracker records five contacts coming from forum.com.

In addition, something *magically* records the fact that the link being used is http://whitakeronline.org/?A1 instead of plain http://whitakeronline.org/

A2 goes to forum.com and sees the mantra. He can’t repost it right away or he’ll get banned for spamming. So he adds a comment to bump the mantra while using the riddle as his sigline. At the end of the riddle he adds: Answer at http://whitakeronline.org/?A2

Twenty people read the riddle and two become curious enough to click A2’s link so whitakeronline.org’s tracker records two more contacts coming from the same page at forum.com.

At this point the tracker reports a total of seven visitors from the same page at forum.com while something *magically* informs us that five used A1’s link while two used A2’s.

An hour later A1 goes to this *magical* webpage and sees that 5 more visitors have come from links with his name after the ? (http://whitakeronline.org/?A1) and that therefore his total activism score has increased by 5 points. Motivated by the rising score he goes out looking for more places to post.

End of scenario.

SysOp please tell me there is a tracker or php module out there that can pull this magic. If there is, we can cut out the activism platform altogether and transfer all the techie complexity from the activist onto a single onsite tracker/module (preferably with public *magic* data).

If this is possible, the landing page (activism handbook) can then be hypercompressed into a simple appeal to help the activism effort by posting mantra or riddle using
http://whitakeronline.org/?YOURNAMEHERE as the forwarding link. That’s it. OK maybe an explanation on creating html links in posts would be needed too, but that’s just a sentence at most:

click here

Anyway, I’ve modified the testing blog (http://mantra7777test.blogspot.com/) so that it now contains four of these theoretical activism links pointing to http://whitakeronline.org/. We can use that for testing.

—-

To anyone reading this who is wondering what the heck we’re doing, the answer is we’re developing an activism model. The point of this model would be to motivate activists into posting in order to bring in traffic that is converted into more activists. All the while exposing people to the mantra. This would effectively pour chain letter exponential growth, i.e. kerosene, onto the fire Bob keeps talking about.

If we can get this working here, I’ll set some sticks alight and run with them to http://majorityrights.com. They’re a very big blog (71,586 unique visitors for april) and I’m confident they’ll adopt this model IF – and only IF – I can show them it works. They’d then use it to foster their own activism and attract more readership. All the while spreading the mantra far and wide.

If it works for a big blog like http://majorityrights.com it’ll be a sure sell to other pro-white blogs/forums. They’re all welcome to encourage the activism-oriented among their readership to push the mantra if it gains them traffic.

In short, the potential blaze is so huge it’s worth trying again and again and again until we develop the right kerosene formula.

Comment by Stevenp