Long before Orwell wrote 1984 there was a standard joke among lawyers about the Double Defense.
The Double Defense says that 1) “MY client didn’t do it and we have witnesses to prove he was elsewhere at the time of the crime” and “We also have witnesses who were at the scene who will testify that he was justified in doing it.”
Actually, some version of the Double Defense has been successfully used, but of course the lawyers consider any jury that would even consider such a defense a bunch of morons.
That is correct.
Imagine my reaction when our people routinely accept a Double Defense.
This Double Defense comes up all the time. Anti-whites say 1) we are NOT committing genocide and 2) Genocide is justifiable. Just how smart does that make US?
But I see this Double Defense in SF All The Time. The anti-whites go straight from denying genocide to repeating Mommy Professor’s Evil White Man stuff. So do any of our Ego Trip pro-whites simply point out that they are JUSTIFYING what they are DENYING?
Nossir. when the witness declares he didn’t do it and then goes on to say he is doing it for a REASON, Old Missing Frontal Lobe trails right along, arguing crime rates and colonization. They want to show how much they know, so it never occurs to them to put aside all their tome information and look at what the OTHER idiot, the one on the other side, just said.
It makes you tired, very, very tired.
#1 by Simmons on 01/26/2010 - 10:55 am
http://www.toqonline.com/2010/01/james-edwards-a3p/comment-page-1/#comment-5722
PHD political party, my take on it.
#2 by Simmons on 01/26/2010 - 11:11 am
http://themormonworker.wordpress.com/2010/01/25/fight-racism-oppose-the-american-renaissance-conference/#comment-1492
Many PHDs respond to a genocidal maniac, I sum it up without resorting to crime stats, IQ or other minutae.
#3 by warweaver on 01/26/2010 - 12:25 pm
Of course, these people dont ‘see it that way’. They see it some other way – they see it as helping out the third worlders.
What is the shortened version of the mantra?
#4 by BGLass on 01/26/2010 - 12:42 pm
Of course, sometimes folks just need a word. A go-ahead that says, ‘It is now time to deconstruct the deconstructionists, to demystify the demystifiers, to demythologize the mythologizers, to explode the ‘inherent social contradictions,’ to read against the grain of the text and compare text and subtext, to correctly ‘historicize’ current reality, to explode the ‘false HIS-story of great men and great events, whomever they may be THIS TIME AROUND, whether Freuds or Marxes or whomever— and then some other people go (omg, EEK emoticon) and realize they just finished training a century of students in their own bag of tricks. You almost feel sorry for them. The big secret of the FAT LADY: she never sings.
#5 by backbaygrouch4 on 01/26/2010 - 2:23 pm
In 1941 the Knave of Boston, Governor’s Councilor Dan Coakley was impeached. Notoriously as a lawyer he had long operated a badger game, though the impetus of his downfall came from enabling by bribery a pardon for Mafia capo Raymond Patriarca. Some time later he sought the same for himself before his former colleagues. Given to lengthy histrionics he tired their patience with two arguments, that he was wrongly convicted and that he was truly repentant. Exasperated one Councilor interrupted him, and this is a paraphrase, “Dan, you know we’re going to pardon you. All we need is one reason. You can’t have it both ways. Chose one and sit down.” It is understandable that Dan Coakley considered the Governor’s Council what Bob termed “a bunch of morons”, indeed it is odd that one of them was not. It hasn’t happened since.
#6 by Dave on 01/26/2010 - 2:32 pm
Simmons,
Wouldn’t it be fantastic to have a political party that wasn’t a “PHD” party. I don’t know of any.
But Robert Whitaker defined politics perfectly: “The only thing that matters is whether the generation you leave behind looks like you.”
That is a political slogan for the ages.
#7 by Simmons on 01/26/2010 - 3:20 pm
The Mantra is that word. When this dam breaks Dave’s horse whipping opinion might seem to be the soft response the white libs and other genociders receive.
You turn the tables on a lefty, get them away from being a sad crazy Aunt Sally or sniffling big momma lib and place the responsibility of all this hate and degeneracy on their small lib shoulders, and the crowd eats them every time. Been there done that
#8 by Simmons on 01/26/2010 - 3:30 pm
http://www.toqonline.com/2010/01/jews-the-american-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-5725
Crime rates again. TAC being used to confuse the issue, and further Unz’s people’s dream of being head cattle driver for god.
#9 by warweaver on 01/26/2010 - 3:51 pm
It really is clear: non-whites just don’t like white people.
I don’t care why they don’t like them – I only need to know, and most importantly need them to know that I know, that they don’t.
#10 by Tim on 01/26/2010 - 11:27 pm
Heads up. I do not know if this someone that posts on Bugs. However, she did a great job.
http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=5294
Mishko and Dietrich, 1/22/2010
This is a 3 hour show. Skip to the 2 hour and 30 minute mark and listen to the last 40 minutes. Listen to the lady talk about White Genocide. She is firing on all cylinders for a call in commentator. She must be reading BUGS.
#11 by shari on 01/27/2010 - 9:41 am
That lady is most definately reading and listening. I was startled when she mentioned Clinton’s speech,as I said the very same to our liberal neighbors,last week. I said ,I can’t imagine any sane black,cheering if somebody announced their genocide the way Clinton announced ours. We have to throw off any idea that anybody has the right to call us haters and moral derelicts. Who do they think they are?
#12 by BGLass on 01/28/2010 - 3:05 pm
Thanks Mishko and Dietrich. Listening and went to order the IQ & Global book. On most sites, it’s about 80 bucks and another title by same authors about $120+. Lol, every paperback I want to read costs between 80-300 bucks. Sometimes more. It’s another telling thing. Liberals in media + introduce electronic readers= book burning.