The Heritage Foundation fired a researcher Jason Richwine because of a paper he had written at Harvard University, that infamous center of Nazi Propaganda, which, among many other things, noted that the lower IQ of Hispanics is largely hereditary.

National Review fired John Derbyshire for an article he wrote that among other things pointed out that five of six blacks were less intelligent than the average white.

A professor, Roger Lane, at a conference referred to himself as “The discredited professor from Emory.” He was the one who wrote such a grossly invented paper for gun control that his fellow mommy professors had to fire him despite his tenure.

It’s all a joke to him because he was immediately given high-paying jobs for his loyalty.

The researchers at the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit in England who falsified global warming information so grossly, as revealed in their email, that even The Silence couldn’t protect them, lost nothing. The Silence has descended on this incident.

You have heard of Political Correctness. Marxism declares everything is political. Until around 1980 someone who read Marxist correspondence was familiar the term. “Politically correct” in Marxist terms is precisely the same as “doctrinally correct” in other religions.

I doubt if there is a single literate person today who actually believes that all races are equal in inherited intelligence. What National Review and the Heritage Foundation and the Global Warming industry are upholding is what I call Politically Factual.

Politically Factual is information which cannot be challenged in exactly the same way that attitudes or terminology must be Politically Correct.

Politically Factual is an important term for BUGS. We deal in information everyone knows is true but which one can be fired for pointing out.

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/07/02/white-rabbit-radio-font-of-racist-genocide-claims-run-by-michigan-man
I was warned against self-styled Intellectuals when I read The Cry and the Covenant about age 12.
Dr. Ignac Semmelweis showeed that the reason obstetricians of his day were killing thousands of women and babies
was because they went from autopsy to the maternity ward wiithout washing their hands.
The medical Intellectuals ruined Semmelweis. In themid-ninteenth century they had all sorts of fancy explanations
for “childbed fever,” including psychological ones.
The idea that a big-time head doctor should wash his hands with carbolic acid insulted them, and they shouted out about how
Intellectual they were.
And the mothers and babies died.
I knew Communism was just plain silly when self-styled Intellectuals were all for it. An economy run entirely by a
group of self-styled Intellectuals is insane.
So now we have white genocide hiding between claims of Intellectualism.
To self-styled intellectuals that’s childish, like asking a major league medical professor in 1850 to wash his hands.
You talk to yourselves and tell yourselves how Intellectual you are.
Semmelweis and Occam say your Final Solution to the White Problem is evil.

NOTE: The last time I put in a comment, they closed the site, giving them time to pad the Comments (I’ve been bere before).

Within two minutes of my putting in this comment, they closed the site and put in a new one.

Bill Maher was on the Comedy Channel interviewing the star of the movie about Che Guevara.

The star of the movie was there, a young guy who didn’t claim to know anything about politics. He was there to promote his movie and make money.

Bill Maher said, “You know that Communism is not a viable system?”

The movie’s star just grinned. But he was in a bad situation. The movie was made by people who saw The Revolution as an Adventure and watched by people who took it seriously. So Maher kept on trying to sound intellectual and the guy playing Che Guevara grinned and evaded.

Obviously a lot of people think there was some kind of dialogue going on here. The Mantra Mind sees two guys playing their roles without making a single point.

If you are to be effective in fighting an evil, you learn about it, you assess it, and you see it clearly.

As a leftist, Maher cannot dismiss Communism. So instead of pointing out that that system had to kill people who tried to escape from it, he uses “viable.”

Actually, Communism is SILLY. A bunch of people who call themselves Intellectuals decide they should run every facet of society, that they should decide what consumers want. If you put it that way, Communism is just plain silly.

But when you bring in words like “viable” or “materialistic,” the argument makes you look good, makes it look like you might be one of those Intellectuals yourself.

We deal with the same problem debating White Genocide. If you want to be an Intellectual so badly that you hate anybody pointing out the simple fact that the goal has always been to get rid of the white race, it is because you share Mayer’s aching desire to be seen as an intellectual.

When one deals professionally with mental illness, he must see giant gap between a person who just needs listening to and a person who is wholly delusional. One rule is that you NEVER enter into the patient’s delusion.
But when you use words like “viable” on a straitjacket case like a person who fancies himself to be a Marxist Intellectual, you are as delusional as he is.

You are not the doctor treating the patient. You are two straitjacket cases babbling at each other.

SPLC’s research is below scorn, starting with the fact they searched all over the country for me and I  was on their mailing list.

But their incompetence delivered the most devastating blow they could have hit me with.  They even ignored Capitol Hill!

From my reading it  says I was a full time college professor who got a Reagan appointment.

A  lifetime college professor!

They REALLY know how to  hurt Ole Bob!

I was the staffer who got the daily list of NSF grants.

Senator Proxmire hated science so he got famous for handing out the Golden Fleece Award. He would just pick some scientific title that his Neanderthal supporters would laugh at and published them.

Scientific publications kept pointing out that Proxmire had an uncanny knack of finding research projects that led to practical excellent results in medicine and other areas.

Now here is the kind of thing I got paid for. Ashbrook asked me if I could make a list like that for him to use.
I gave him a lesson straight from “Why was this information produced?” I told him that Proxmire got away with this because he was a liberal fool. If Ashbrook made the same dumbass error, the press would crucify him.

The Director of OPM I worked under as a Reagan appointee disliked me for calling him on dumbass publicity tricks that his own beloved assistants called genius. So he got rid of me and I went to career writer at VOA.

That same Director was the only Reagan appointee who got reappointed by Reagan in 1985, but who pulled such a dumbass trick that he did not get Senate approval. It is almost unique for a reelected President not to get the approval of the Senate for a renomination, especially in a Senate controlled by his own Party.

A pro staffer can save your ass.