I mentioned before that Portnoy’s Complaint started with Portnoy proving he was a good man. But every instance of his being a good man was what he did for Jews.
Portnoy’s Complain, as I said, was a best-seller among Jews because it expressed their own internal psychoanalysis, and among gentiles because this as a new, unguarded frankness about Jews, a new thing to them.
A major theme every good Jew hears every Saturday is how everybody else is bad to Jews. If sermon after sermon in a church declared how evil the Jews are to everybody else, it would be suppressed.
Jews are raised on resentment. I have often said that today’s Christianity is just self-hatred and today’s Judaism consists entirely of feeling sorry for themselves.
The influence of churches on Western gentile thinking does not end when a person becomes a lapsed Catholic or an agnostic Protestant. New England’s rabid intolerance of and hostility to the West and the South, including that of the Kennedys, is straight out its Puritan background.
Harvard persecutes those who are suspected of believing in heresy as Cotton Mather did.
Jews do not leave their resentments when they leave the synagogue.
An American Jew invented the term “melting pot,”, Emma Lazarus declared America open to all other peoples, but in her time she was better known as a crusading Zionist, seeking a homeland for Jews only.
Franz Boas introduced the idea that all non-whites had a common cause with Jews. To him, anybody who was not a white gentile was the common enemy. He was a Marxist, but his thinking came straight out of his childhood religion, just as that of Harvard does.
Benjamin Franklin points out that, though he was a Free Thinker, he doubted he would have had his dedication to Morality and the Virtues if he had not been raised in a strictly Christian household.
Jews are dedicated to their own, as Portnoy details. It never occurs to him otherwise. Many great truths are spoken of only in jest.
And this truth is critical to us. Jews as a group are fanatically devoted to minorities against whites because resentment is their morality. They are ferocious when they get on the race issue because to them non-whites are honorary Jews, little Jews.
I think that is what made Germany go Nazi. German Jews were solidly Communist before Hitler entered politics. Even a Jew has written a book about how the sudden rise of Communism terrified the Germans and he blames that as much as the genetic Evil of Germans for Hitler’s rise. He got a lot of criticism, but the book got published.
Mantra Thinking sees what is actually there. White suicide as our morality owes more to our own Traditional Values, from Zoroaster through Saint Paul, than it does to the Jews. Latin countries were pushing “asimilacion” centuries before Franz Boas was born.
Jewish hostility, everyone must now agree that Jews are immune to simple Hate, is endemic.
We Christians must see and overcome our self-hatred. If Jews do not similarly overcome their hostility to those around them, they must be expelled.
#1 by Epiphany on 09/14/2010 - 7:29 am
“Little Jews” is a good term.
When Radical Feminists, for,
example, whine about the
Patriarcy, or, when Blacks whine
about Slavery,
they do sound a bit like Jews
whining about the Holocaust.
#2 by Epiphany on 09/14/2010 - 7:31 am
For those sick of
Political Correctness,
there is now Zionist
Correctness.
Unlike Political
Correctness,
Zionist Correctness
allows one to criticize
the Muslims, and whatever
nonWhites the Jewish people
are at war with.
#3 by BGLass on 09/14/2010 - 9:43 am
White suicide is actually UNGODLY, and that’s the way out of the problem. It’s just not Godly to not stick up for yourself. Just as on an individual level, committing suicide is no way out, at least according to preachers, it’s no way out on the larger social playing field, either. We must be accepted with our warts—and live, just as Jesus would accept us, and so on.
Back in school, students could only do two things: A: find their own inner victim and position themselves that way, writing papers about their own trials and tribs, and how they were oppressed (by their white patriarchial dad, or being female, or a victim of crime, or having an immigrant in the family who was grossly oppressed which made they, themselves, second-generation oppressed victims, which they could never get over, or whatever. So they were a victim, too, a Little Jew.
OR they could adopt the sympathizer position, and take the patronizing moral high ground, assuming they were not a victim, but the oppressor and were now going to “disempower themselves” (something teachers talked about directly), and “save” the others (by not striving themselves, so the others who really were not as good could finally have the illusion of great success and so on.)
But of course, it’s assumed that, deep down, everyone else knows of this great, noble, self-sacrifice where the person did not strive for anything so others could win, and the “playing fields could be LEVELED,” (meaning the person was leveled, really, who did not strive or bother to compete), or whatever.
WELL… They never SAY that. “Leveling the playing field…” well, the PLAYING FIELD cannot be “leveled.” It is the runners on the field, not the LAND, that ARE LEVELED. They are hobbled, just the way Kathy Bates hobbles her prey in that old movie, Misery. The land has not changed at all. People are hobbled, neutralized, demoralized, demonized, vilified, degraded—-lol, victimized IN FACT!
And then cognitive dissonance must set in b/c, really, the “successful” people aren’t even cognizant of this non-striving (anti-life) sacrifice, WHICH from the other point of view actually got them everything they have, and they just get huge paychecks for nothing and maybe a BMW car they are super proud of, (or whatever.), and think they earned it.
Sometimes, the disempowered get resentful and become Republicans then. They are little Horatio Algers pulling themselves up by the bootstraps like Hannity and it’s just not fair others don’t do that, too. Often they are immigrant-identified. So, they are the good immigrants v the bad immigrants (who did not do it “the right way,” meaning they got affirmative action, and the Horatio Alger who did all that work is now mad about not getting the free stuff. Although they still maintain that everyone should have THE SAME “opportunity.” How would that work, lol?
Either way, in school, they were doing themselves and others serious harm, especially in the long run, even if it appeared moral in the short term. The body is a temple, and so suicide is bad. Period. Whether individual or societal.
In school, though, nobody EVER wondered at the wisdom of organizing whole societies around the victim concept. At any rate, it is how Marxists organize their internal, and therefore external, worlds—and the white flaw is making decisions, for many reasons, to buy into suicide, instead of saying screw all the various Dr. Kevorkians who wish to assist their deaths.
#4 by Epiphany on 09/14/2010 - 1:23 pm
Well, Political Correctness
is meant to fade away.
It shall, of course, be
replaced with Zionist
Correctness!
#5 by Dick_Whitman on 09/14/2010 - 3:32 pm
“White suicide as our morality owes more to our own Traditional Values, from Zoroaster through Saint Paul, than it does to the Jews.” (Bob)
Exactly, had there never been an opening, the Jews would have never been able to grab a hold. That’s why I see this current struggle against White genocide as a gift (in the form of a test) from the creator (or nature depending on how one looks at things).
Whites are being forced to evolve. This is nature’s iron law. Whites either evolve, or they go extinct.
This struggle is an opportunity for self improvement. Whites have the opportunity to truly learn something about ourselves (our propensity towards self hate), that will benefit our bloodlines forever. Part of having true wisdom is understanding oneself.
In the past our ancestors in prior civilizations chose White genocide through assimilation. This usually came in the form of some sort of universalist ideology.
Now we’re seeing this on a global level. If we decide to go brown on a global scale, it will mean the end FOR GOOD. At the same time, because communication and consciousness IS on a global level, we have the opportunity to truly put an end to out suicidal tendencies FOR GOOD.
A people’s spiritual system should be structured so that it counteracts the group’s negative characteristics. For the Jews, this should counteract their hatred for the other (GOY=cattle=non-Jew). For Whites, this should counteract our hatred for ourselves.
#6 by Epiphany on 09/14/2010 - 6:35 pm
Most of the Slave Ships,
which brought Blacks to
America, and other parts
of the New World were owned,
and funded by the Jews.
Ergo, it is most hypocritical
of the Jews to claim to
feel for the plight of the Negro,
in Ameria. The Jews were the authors
of their troubles, and ours, for
that matter.
Do not let them shed their crocidile
tears for the Blacks,
for that is all the Jews shed,
Crocidile tears!
#7 by Epiphany on 09/14/2010 - 6:57 pm
The key to our whole
strategy is this:
convince the African Americans
that the Jews are not their friends,
but are only using them!
There must be some wedge we
can place between these two
foes of the White Gentiles.
#8 by seriouswon on 09/14/2010 - 11:28 pm
The key to our strategy is the Mantra.
#9 by Frank on 09/14/2010 - 11:37 pm
In the face of Hillary Clinton’s filing a UN Complaint seeking the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to rule that AZ’s new immigration law violates “human rights”, I have filed a complaint (registered mail 9/3/10) with that same High Commissioner charging the US Federal Government with GENOCIDE of European-American Christians. I ask you to publicize this in any ways that you can. It truly is a powerful response that can be used to bring Clinton, Obama et al. into at least an interesting dilemma.
The act of GENOCIDE trumps all international and human rights laws (and US Public Law and the US Constitution (see attached filing), and if the UN Commissioner Pillay dares to rule favorably on Hillary’s complaint, she must *MUST* rule that the intentional destruction of Euro-American Christians preempts and nullifies Clinton’s lesser complaint, and all efforts that coddle Third World immigration, legal and illegal. Such a UN ruling also would stop all challenges to AZ law, and force the Feds to immediately halt
all efforts to maintain open borders, and begin legal reparations to restore the majority Euro-Am Christian population. If UN Commissioner Pillay upholds Clinton’s complaint, but refuses to act on this GENOCIDE complaint, she is ruling that human rights and international laws, including the 1948 UN Convention on Genocide are no longer binding on the U.S. government or
that European-American Christians, alone, are not protected by those laws.
That said, I ask all of you to publicize this complaint, and ask others to use it to file their own complaints. I believe that actions of Clinton, AG Holder’s DOJ, Congress, the Supreme Court and the entire Obama Administration — having taken steps to subvert our Constitution and laws, both of which in fact SUPPORT the UN Convention on Genocide — must be met with a superseding complaint in the UN.
Terry Graham
———–
NEW RELEASE – For immediate release
Sept. 13, 2010
For more information, email Terry Graham at EuroAmRights@hotmail.com
California Woman Files UN Complaint Charging Feds with Genocide of Euro-American Christians
A California woman has filed a formal complaint with the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights charging the US federal government with genocide of European-American Christians through its immigration policies.
Terry Graham sent the eight-page complaint to UN High Commissioner Navanethem Pillay on Sept. 3, after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s filed a report with Pillay’s office claiming that the federal government’s legal challenge to Arizona’s new immigration law will protect “human rights”.
In July, the US Dept. of Justice filed a lawsuit in federal district court seeking to nullify and prevent enforcement of Arizona’s immigration law, asserting the federal government alone has authority over immigration. Earlier, President Obama attacked Arizona’s law, saying it was “unfair” and potentially violated the civil rights of Hispanic citizens.
“The US Constitution, and US federal and international laws against genocide preempt and nullify all laws, policies and procedures – including those advanced illegally last month by the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of our federal government that result in the destruction of European-Americans,” says Graham.
Graham’s complaint cites the UN Genocide Convention of 1948, international and human rights laws, US Public Law 95-435 and the US Constitution, Article I, Section 8, which gives the US Congress the power to “define and punish… offences against the Law of Nations.”
The UN Genocide Convention defines genocide” as “deliberately inflicting upon [a group] conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction in whole or in part.” Article II further defines genocide as “causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group” and “imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group”, which can include job losses and taxation policies that cause stress and lower
birthrates. Under the Convention, which Congress adopted under US Public Law 95-435, “group” is defined by nation, race, ethnicity, or religion.
Graham noted that in 1960, Euro-American Christians comprised 89% percent of the nation’s population, but now are minorities in many parts of the United States solely due to federal actions that promote massive Third world immigration.
In 1998, Hillary Clinton’s husband, Pres. Bill Clinton, publicly
acknowledged that the destruction of White Christian Americans was intentional when he said, “In a little more than 50 years, there will be no majority race in the United States.”
In her complaint, Graham asks the UN Human Rights Commissioner to promptly investigate her charges and “make an immediate, formal request of the US federal government to place a judicial stay on all US laws, policies, procedures, lawsuits and legal actions that advance this genocide.” She is also seeking reparations as defined by the UN Genocide Convention that “must wipe out all the consequences of the illegal act and to re-establish the situation which would, in all probability, have existed if that act had not been committed.”
Graham is urging others to file their own complaints with the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights via mail or email as soon as possible. She also asks that lawsuits be filed charging the US federal government with genocide of European-American Christians in US and courts in nations who are signatories to the UN Convention on Genocide.
“If the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights refuses or fails to investigate and rule on my complaint that the U.S. federal government’s laws, policies, procedures and other actions are an act of genocide against U.S. European-American Christians, we must conclude that ”human rights and international law are no longer binding on the U.S. government or that European-American Christians, alone, are not protected by those laws, Graham said.
#10 by seriouswon on 09/15/2010 - 1:31 am
Can’t wait to see what comes of this!