Archive for July, 2012

Saying “Everybody is Just Human” is Saying Genocide is Impossible

No matter how they say, “Race does not exist” or some sickening smile with “Racism will end when everybody realizes we all just human,” you are saying that genocide is impossible.

Genocide is not destroying humans. Genocide is destroying a PARTICULAR KIND of human.

Mao Tse Tung is estimated to have starved and murdered about fifty million Chinese. But no one objects to China having his smiling picture as its symbol, because those were Chinese, not Jews, Gypsies or any other IDENTIFIABLE group.

They were just a few million of these “humans.”

So call them on it when they use this “humans” crap, just as you do when they use the “no such thing as race” crap.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

17 Comments

“Going Public” with Street Activism

“Do we really have a chance without going public?” (John Locke)

The commenter “John Locke” asked the question above regarding street activism. For some time now I’ve been thinking about this subject so I took his comment as a good opportunity to address it.

One mistake many White activists make is assuming that street activism is necessary for our success. They believe this because they see National Socialist Germany as their model. This is a mistake. The NS of Germany had to spread their message via the street because there was no other way to get a message out when they had no access to the major media sources (newspapers, radio). Today with the internet this isn’t necessary.

Since the beginning of American White Nationalism not one street demonstration/rally has made one bit of difference (in fact, in total they’ve probably had a negative effect). Even the intellectual White Nationalists with their scholarly meetings and 1000 page tomes have had more success at influencing minds compared to the street marchers. The worst elements of White Nationalist Times Past have been the street marchers. When discussing street marchers, some White Nationalists will say “at least they have balls.”  It’s important to understand that it’s easy to “have balls” when you have nothing to lose or when you’re paid by the anti-Whites.

Of course, although it’s not really necessary to have street marches, it doesn’t mean it can’t be done. If people wanted to wear BUGS t-shirts with the Mantra printed on the back and clean up a public park or beach, this would be good activism.  If someone wanted to hand out mantra flyers while wearing a White Rabbit costume, this too would be good.  If someone wanted to walk across America (and say the mantra in the town center of all the towns they pass through) to raise awareness of White genocide (while wearing a BUGS or Follow the White Rabbit t-shirt), this could be an option as well.

The most important aspect to consider with public activism (or any dissemination of a message) is the presentation. Political theater is art. This is where one needs to take an honest look at oneself and determine if one is truly appropriate for representing the pro-White movement. If one is a poor public speaker, or prone to anger and excitability, or is just plain ugly, they should be wise enough to know that they’ll only hurt the cause they claim to advocate for. When it comes to people like this, they should accept that they’re not cut out for this role and find another way to help the cause (spreading the mantra at the SWARM, creating art, website support, financial support, writing articles).

So to answer John Locke’s question regarding street rallies and “going public,” the answer is “NO,” we don’t need to do this to “have a chance.” We just need to disseminate our message in the most attractive and creative way possible. If someone wants to try to disseminate the message using political theater on the street, then go for it. But it has to be done in an attractive and creative way.

With that said, if I were the anti-Whites and I was worried (which they are…trust me) about the message at BUGS spreading out of control, I would create a street activist entity for the purpose of polluting the message. I would populate this entity with buffoons, scumbags, and weirdos and have them go public to push the BUGS message while acting like circus monkeys.

I would then give them media attention so that they become the face of the BUGS message. I would use the SPLC to report on this entity of circus monkeys to frame them as the face of the pro-White consistent message. I would do all I could to try to associate the BUGS message with this unit of circus monkeys.

This is what I’m looking for. The enemy knows it can’t handle our message. So the best thing they can do is try to pollute it and associate it with the buffoons, scumbags, and weirdos of White Nationalist Times Past.  Look for the sudden appearance of a street activism entity that starts getting a lot of media exposure.

The anti-Whites have been doing all they can to ignore BUGS, Follow the White Rabbit, and the Mantra.  BUGS and Follow the White Rabbit appear nowhere on the SPLC’s or ADL’s website and this is out of fear of advertising our message for us.  Of course, they’ll feature big reports on “radical right” entities with 6 people, but won’t dare say a word about BUGS or FTWR.

But they know that they have to DO SOMETHING to try to stop the spread of our message!  So the anti-Whites will create this street activism entity (which may also have an internet radio show, YouTube channel, or blog) to pollute our message and associate it with the buffoons, scumbags, and weirdos of White Nationalist Times Past.  Remember that the anti-Whites can’t handle a practiced BUGS Adept (they’ll never invite Bob, or the White Rabbit, or Lord Nelson, or Beefcake on a radio show or TV interview).  All they can do is use dirty tricks (1).  So they’ll create their own BUGSter circus monkey unit that they can handle and present it as the face of our message.

(1) http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/11/i-hate-to-be-nice-to-anybody-but-i-cant-improve-on-dick-whitmans-statement/

 

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

, , ,

33 Comments

Subtext: White Privilege

For those lurkers and casual readers out there who don’t “buy in” to the FACT that what anti-whites are perpetrating against our children is genocide, I submit the following to you:

Recently, courtesy of Tim Jacob Wise and Co., the anti-whites have ratcheted up the White Privilege meme through their preferred outlet in Duluth, MN. Talk about privilege.

Despite their best and well-funded efforts, WE won the first battle on that front as UMD (University of Minnesota’s Diversity) has – for the moment – officially repudiated their methods and message and pulled their support of the Unfair Campaign. Thumbs up. However, there is more to what they did with this. It’s time to crunch the subtext of the message they delivered.

EVERYBODY in the Respectable World agrees that there is this thing called White Privilege.

EVERYBODY says that this Privilege can, should, and will be taken away.

EVERYBODY says that there is one way and ONLY one way to solve this problem of White Privilege.

When asked HOW whites are “privileged,” they say we were “BORN that way. We’re white.” Clearly, the solution to the problem of whites being born with White Privilege is to do away with the problem of us being here; to genocide our race. They might sugarcoat their program and say things like “We all bleed red. We’re all one race,” but what they really mean is “On Earth, whites have no place.”

You know the rest…

The Mantra machine of simple truth triumphs once more.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

, ,

12 Comments

BUGS IS EVOLVING, SEND BOB SCALPS

BoardAd came up with this Guest Writer Program.

Bob is elated, and not just because he wants to do less work.

Well, not ENTIRELY because he wants to do less work.

The Guest Writer Program, put into effect by BoardAd, has done very well.

I remind you that my one huge worry was that I would end up like William Pierce, saying on my deathbed that I had no worthy successor. Henry VII had it right: Successors are EVERYTHING.

The ultimate victory for me would be for you to be successors.

Believe me, I now how it feels to break into writing. So let me tell those who had the GUTS to send in articles, so far every one has been a real contribution.

And I noticed that guest articles got more comments than my recent ones.

As for the comments, they outdid my hopes.

One discussion covered the wording of the Mantra. But what DELIGHTED me was it came out as team work, not niggling over a word.

To sum it up, you are showing signs of being ready to get out of the egg and start eating worms.

And starting your own nests.

Seriously, the articles are impressive to me, and the comments keeping them in line are impressive to Ole Bob,

Bob of BUGS has produced a team that can go right up into collegiate and pro.

You now only have to learn to control your nerves and get experience.

Because you are not afraid to face and cut down everybody in what they consider their Intellectual Big Leagues.

It is great feeling to be BEST at something.

Enjoy it.

And send me their scalps.

The Comments hit on the discipline and how it applied. Further it discussed standard suggestions for changing the Mantra.

Yu can always tell a BUGSER from an outsider, a pro-white who has been fighting from a pro-white who has been theorizing, by his undertone of “Did you try it? Did it WORK!”

And underneath, there is development. In the face of the desbots, you have to develop mini-mantras.

I see commenters stating how they ran into a comment and grabbed back into the pile of one-sentence ammunition the Mantra provides and pulled out the grenade they needed.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

23 Comments

Some subtext

When anti-Whites say “White people are genetically evil” they are saying that race is real.

When anti-Whites say “White people stole land” they are saying land is racial property.

When anti-Whites say “White people controlling White countries is White privilege” they are saying non-Whites controlling non-White countries is non-White privilege.

When anti-Whites say “Humanity is 99.9% the same” they are saying they have no respect for human identity.

When anti-Whites say “You shouldn’t say that,” they are saying they are against freedom of speech and that you need to be censored.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

8 Comments