My nephew has just started medical school in Moscow. He was the only American in the class, not a new experience for a member of our family.
Other students asked him why American medical terms are in Latin. In Western Europe, prescriptions are still written in Latin. But the other students, most of whom are from the third world, said they did all their medical writing in English.
In the West, the traditional scholarly language was Latin. But Roman scholars did not write in Latin. The Roman upper class used Greek. The expression, “He has no Greek” is from old Rome, indicating a person of lower rank.
We look back to Rome. Rome looked back to Greece. The new world looks to America. An upper class Russian or Malaysian speaks English.
One instructor asked the students in my nephew’s class to introduce themselves and say where they were from. When my nephew said he was from the United States, she said, “We are honored.” If a student at a German university in 1200 AD had said he was from Rome, the instructor might have said, “We are honored.”
The Roman Empire has been gone from Western Europe for over 1500 years, but prescriptions are still written in the Roman vernacular (not in Greek). That is because in the end Rome was not known for being loved, but for accomplishing mighty deeds.
No one will ever have that kind of respect for post-World War II Europe. Europe knows that and hates us for it. All of Europe’s miserable little welfare politicians will be forgotten before they are buried. They do nothing anybody cares about.
No one is more critical of the misuse of American power than I am. But Old Europe makes me sick. Like most serious inferiority complexes, the European one is in a guise of feeling superior.
Nobody is fooled. These are little people doing little things who hate a giant for being a giant. It is accidental when I happen to agree with them, and they make me sick.
Right or wrong, we are the new Rome. We made the modern world.
#1 by Jason on 01/14/2013 - 10:17 am
The irony is, if Europe had kept itself White, it could have surpassed a brown US (if we go that way). But that would require leaders that cared about their people. Hopefully, they will reverse course soon.
#2 by Dave on 01/14/2013 - 10:27 am
The Mantra lifts the veil on the communal self-deception of the Europeans and Americans.
It isn’t the atrocities of the past that keep Europe mired in the memories of the World Wars and America mired in the memories of the Civil War.
These are cultures of self-deception. It is not the past that is sought to be avoided. It is the unendurable implications of the present.
Mommy Professor plays a hideous game. Her caste is a plague upon is. She exposes corpses to the light. She then proceeds to feed upon their fetid flesh. A hideous fate is thereby borne into the present, made even more hideous by a hideous fate in death. Beware corpses that reflect the light of the moon. Some ghastly animal is feeding off their dead flesh.
This is an implication of being condemned to hell.
Slavery was liberation for the female slave! She was liberated from the barbarity of her world. While for the male slave, it was an apprehension, a placement into restraints, an imprisonment. It is from HIS barbarity (the barbarity of nonwhite males) that the female slave was liberated. That was WHY she was so JUBILANT to be taken into slavery.
Presently, in America, two million mostly nonwhite males languish in American prisons. No one mentions that this represents liberation for nonwhite females.
And this is precisely what threatens us whites!!!
Only a TRULY DELUSIONAL people celebrate Martin Luther King Day.
Robert Whitaker really did a number on us with the Mantra. Its IMPLICATIONS are bigger than even he knows. He lifted the veil off the whole damn thing. He reconnected white people with reality.
#3 by Epiphany on 01/14/2013 - 10:44 am
I never thought of it like that. Still, it is true. Slavery liberated the Black woman from the patriarchal customs of the African savages. Still, they never thank us!
#4 by Jmcaul on 01/16/2013 - 1:25 am
I never thought of it THIS way: “(Bob) reconnected White people with reality.” Before the mantra, reality was too terrible for me to contemplate. I hid from it in the bottle for many years. When that no longer was ‘sustainable’ I dove into the blind pie in the sky, invisible friend brand of ‘Christianity.’ I just KNEW Jesus was going to swoop in at any minute and set everything right. A combination of things got me seeing things differently including responding to temptation in a distinctly human fashion. Once my delusions of rapturous escape were gone I finally faced the fact that race IS real and it DOES matter. Not only does the mantra connect we Whites to reality, it gives us a roadmap to a future we did not have before.
#5 by Epiphany on 01/14/2013 - 11:17 am
Well, I know that the U.S. Media is unfairly more preoccupied with Nazi sins than Soviet sins. [Sigh], Of course, we all know that was because the Soviets were U.S. Allies.
Still, have any of you noticed that what they say about the Nazis always changes? I remember when I heard that the Nazis were some sort of White Supremacists. Nowadays, the Media makes the claim that the Nazis were too friendly with the Arab Muslims. They always change their story!
#6 by Mediakrig on 01/14/2013 - 11:23 pm
“They always change their story!”
It is not a new thing either.
Archeology have shown there were no viking attacks on the British Isles, so this part is a later change of story. What they find, is an economic boom when the vikings arrived.
Very few British or Scandinavian saints are acknowledged by the Catholic Church, but we are supposed to have been Catholic for 500 years.
A German living in the 13. century, would have thought he lived in the Roman Empire. It was first well after the Babylonian captivity, and the fall of Byzantium that the Germans learned that there had been another Roman Empire, and that their was the Holy Roman Empire.
Few have heard about the Swedish revolution, and that includes Swedes. Even fewer know that there was nothing like the Kalmar Unioun, as it was caller Kingdom of the North or Nordrike at the time.
North of the Roman Empire, you had Noricum, so north of the Holy Roman Empire, you had to find the Kalmar union.
Orwell spoke the truth, when he said the those that control the present, controls the past.
#7 by dungeoneer on 01/14/2013 - 1:11 pm
Bob: “All of Europe’s miserable little welfare politicians”
I`m assume you`re referring to the Cold War American Defense of Europe spending and the paltry European contribution towards it.
This is explained in the anti-white anti-Americanism by them saying:
“America obliterated its economic competitors in ww2 and pissed the winnings up the wall in 50 years”
As a pre-BUGS English nationalist, my emotional connection to “Europeanism” or “English Nationalism” is like my emotional connection to the world of Middle Earth in the works of J.R Tolkien.
#8 by Cleric Preston on 01/14/2013 - 5:39 pm
“I`m assume you`re referring to the Cold War American Defense of Europe spending and the paltry European contribution towards it.”
The European defence spending against Communist invasion was massive, in the period immediately preceeding the Cold War, i.e WW2
The ONLY reason the USA had to spend big to defend half of Europe during the Cold war was because the USA spent big to support the Communist invasion of Europe during the Hot war, i.e WW2
#9 by The Cheshire Cat on 01/14/2013 - 3:42 pm
“All of Europe’s miserable little welfare politicians will be forgotten before they are buried. They do nothing anybody cares about.
No one is more critical of the misuse of American power than I am. But Old Europe makes me sick. Like most serious inferiority complexes, the European one is in a guise of feeling superior.”
Well, how very PROVINCIAL of you, Bob. Americans and our government are by our very nature an extension of Europe. Does it pain you to be called what you really are, an European American?
#10 by OldBlighty on 01/14/2013 - 6:55 pm
What does his lineage have to do with his observations of the real world?
#11 by The Cheshire Cat on 01/14/2013 - 11:19 pm
Bob brought it up, not me.
Pop quiz:
Q: Which is more stupid? European anti-whites or European American anti-whites?
A: Trick question. They are both slightly more intelligent than amoebae.
#12 by OldBlighty on 01/15/2013 - 12:00 am
So you are unable to answer my question?
I asked it because I got the impression, you didn’t put any thought into what you wrote.
#13 by The Cheshire Cat on 01/15/2013 - 10:36 am
So sad that you fail to see how complex my simple question is. Yours is a question that needn’t be answered as it has no bearing on my point.
You might see that if you bothered to think about WHY I wrote what I did.
#14 by Dick_Whitman on 01/14/2013 - 5:24 pm
So what will tomorrow’s English be?
#15 by BGLass on 01/14/2013 - 6:48 pm
Idk— many Americans have not had family members in Europe for, very truly, 400 YEARS. This is more common than people are led to believe.
It seems rude to expect people who have not been somewhere for 400 YEARS, nor have any family who have been, to identify with “europeans” as if they are the exact same people. GENETICALLY, they are, of course, but to lump them with Euro-euros is to invalidate the past 400 YEARS OF THEIR FAMILIES struggles in an entirely different world—and a world where they WISHED strongly to be separate from some european culture and restraints.
Surprising that there are people who would not be anxious to acknowledge the different reality of colonists (whether S.A., AUS., U.S., etc.
It’s a turnoff in much of “white” nationalism. (If you really cared about Whites, you would care about their REAL, LIVED experience (like the fact they have never been to Europe, nor has anyone in their family, for 400 YEARS. A very long time, really, though they share genes.
I would not go to South Africa, and think I was “european” in the exact way as South Africans. We share genetics, but a deep wealth of experience is different that should not be invalidated. By contrast, I would be very interested in what they have done, what they have undergone, and I would not claim it as my own, but be interested in them.
#16 by The Cheshire Cat on 01/14/2013 - 11:10 pm
“and a world where they WISHED strongly to be separate from some european culture and restraints.”
400 years is but a blink of an eye. How quickly we divorce ourselves from the reality which gave birth to us.
Awfully presumptuous of you to purport to know their thoughts, dontchyathink? At what point does the inherent need for resources in order to survive begin to creep into WHITES’ minds? Remember those evil nazis and their lebensraum? Remember those Indian-slaying colonists and their colonial expansionism? Why are people so certain they were anxious to forget everything about themselves? Simply because they left their homeland? Wow…
I doubt anyone can explain how the socialism and welfare programs subscribed to in the US are any different than the ones championed in Europe. I hope nobody is delusional enough to think that because we have guns that we are any less socialist. Is the net outcome of said programs (Eurocide) going to be any different because of geography?
If you are American and you want to see the future of your country, then look across the pond. If you are living in Europe and you want to see the future of your country, then look no further than the cape of good hope. Achievements of the Afrikaners and Boers pale in comparison to those of the indigenous white rabbits of Europe, but they are no less dear to MY heart because of that? For shame.
Like lifeguards, we will drag them kicking and screaming to safety. These are OUR people. This is our duty.
Besides, who in the hell would want to play a game of catchup with the Roman Empire, or the Greeks for that matter?
Surprising there are BUGSters who do not understand this.
#17 by OldBlighty on 01/15/2013 - 12:31 am
I looked up the online dictionary and found no such word ‘Eurocide’. You are having a really bad day, aren’t you Cheshire?
Pro Whites call it White GENOCIDE, because what is being done to White people is GENOCIDE according to UN Law.
If you don’t agree it is White GENOCIDE, then you are a GENOCIDE denier and are anti-White.
#18 by The Cheshire Cat on 01/15/2013 - 10:56 am
It’s not in the glossary because I haven’t PUT it in there yet.
Never learned what the word synonym means? Boy, I think they covered that when I was in grammar school.
Here let me break it apart for you. The euro part refers to EUROPEAN the -cide part comes from genocide. Are you WHiTE? Then you are European. Or is skin color all that race is to you? Don’t you see how this “white” label serves to divorce us from our ancestors, culture and heritage? We need to start reclaiming what is ours. There’s no I in WE, TEAM or European.
Best you start dealing with reality sooner rather than later. Judging by your name, you probably don’t have much time left to do so.
Being pro-white means taking our culture and heritage with our people. You can’t just choose and pick what you like about WHITES. This isn’t a friggin cafeteria. You’re not a cafeteria pro-white are you? Are you a cafeteria Catholic too?
#19 by dungeoneer on 01/15/2013 - 1:16 pm
“Here let me break it apart for you. The euro part refers to EUROPEAN the -cide part comes from genocide. Are you WHiTE? Then you are European. Or is skin color all that race is to you?”
The -cide refers to a murder, as in the common garden variety homi-cide.
If I was an anti-white, I would like to see the charge of white genocide reduced to a misnomer and compared to a street crime.
” Don’t you see how this “white” label serves to divorce us from our ancestors”
You dive into the pit of absurdity no doubt with a Cheshire Cat grin on your face, much like our friend Feldhasen over at Endgame Exotica White Rabbit Radio.
#20 by The Cheshire Cat on 01/15/2013 - 6:25 pm
IN YOUR OPINION.
You’re just saying that because you lack initiative and fail at innovation. Play right into anti-whites labels for us. That’s your prerogative.
Unlike you, my history, ancestry and culture is more than just the color of my skin. Now, who’s being absurd.
#21 by The Cheshire Cat on 01/15/2013 - 6:29 pm
Here’s a simple question for you:
If somebody kills a person because they’re WHITE, what crime are they guilty of?
#22 by The Cheshire Cat on 01/15/2013 - 6:37 pm
Here’s some free education for you since you failed in the first:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_types_of_killing
Please pay particular attention to the KILLING OF OTHERS section. You’re welcome.
#23 by The Cheshire Cat on 01/15/2013 - 11:03 am
“Funny” how you focused on one word and missed the ENTIRE concept in my post. No wonder Bob gets so frustrated with commenters.
#24 by OldBlighty on 01/14/2013 - 6:57 pm
“In the West, the traditional scholarly language was Latin. But Roman scholars did not write in Latin. The Roman upper class used Greek. The expression, “He has no Greek” is from old Rome, indicating a person of lower rank.”
Intellectuals have always talked gibberish, to impress the yokels in the lower ranks. It is a very old game.
#25 by Mediakrig on 01/14/2013 - 10:48 pm
I don’t like the welfare state a lot, but it is flat out wrong to think it is not a great help in saving white people.
If you compare the USA to the welfare states in Europe, people start complaining a lot quicker, if they are forced to pay high taxes, and watch it go to immigrants that despise you. People also start to complain a lot quicker if they are forced to live around immigrants, because the state spread them around, thinking that if only white people got to know brown people, racism would be gone.
The opposite is of course true. You become race realist, if you are forced to live around them, as you will observe that racial differences are real.
That brown people don’t stop other brown people from preying on whites, is also a lesson you learn when you start having brown immigrants, and it also gives us an opportunity to make the point that if a non-white group harass, rape and beat up another non-white group, it is called (low level) ethnic warfare, and if the preyed upon non-white group moves because of it, it is called ethnic cleansing.
If it is whites being preyed upon by non-whites however, it’s of course not ethnic warfare according to the anti-whites, but rather individual criminals that just happens to be non-white, and if whites moves because of it, it is the whites that are racist, as they don’t want to integrate with non-whites.
This obvious double standard is proof as good as any, that anti-racist really means anti-white.
I have also found it useful to point out, that thanks to non-white immigration, intra-white racism will become a thing of the past, as the intra-white differences are so small, compared to the differences we find between races. It is true that the European nations exaggerated European differences in the past, so I can understand that many thought it was similar with whites and non-whites. It was when they found out they were wrong, that the real crime began. Like almost always, it is trying to cover up an excusable mistake, that makes it into a huge crime.
I think that this last part is the origin of different outlook on race between the North and the South of the USA. In the South you had both whites and blacks, so they observed that race was real, but in the North, you had Germans, English, Dutch, Scandinavians,etc, all finding out that they in reality belonged to the same race.
#26 by Jmcaul on 01/15/2013 - 6:09 pm
This is a really important point. I have noticed too that whites who have not (yet) had to live in “integrated” settings are the least racially aware and the most likely to provide aid and comfort to our enemies if not outright BE true anti-Whites. I lived South of the Mason-Dixon line and attended “integrated” public schools from the age of 7 to the age of 14. first in Annapolis, MD and then in Savannah, GA. In that setting you learn REAL fast just what is what. Then, our family moved to the Pacific Northwest which had (and still does to a degree) comparatively small non-White populations and LOTS of Scandinavians. I went from 7 years of 50% non-white schools to about 99.999% white. It was a true breath of fresh air. BUT, my husband’s sister, who lived her whole life in the PNW ended up miscegenating. I remember even though I was not really awake to White Genocide at the time, being inwardly horrified, I could not IMAGINE ANY self-respecting blonde beauty (and she was that and still is) making that choice of a mate, much less even viewing a non-White in romantic terms. In addition, one of my husband’s brothers married a halfrican and the other brother earned his B.A. in Black Studies. This was a White family who had lived their entire lives in a 99.999% White region.
I remember at the time feeling vaguely uncomfortable with their attitudes but telling myself that ‘times had changed.’ If I had been as aware back then as I am now I probably would have never married my husband once I found out!
My MAIN point here is, how NAIVE Whites who are never exposed to large non-White populations and therefore never have to learn to survive among them are.
This phenomenon would ALMOST argue AGAINST us having our own countries. If we ever do get any, their Constitutions MUST insist that the teaching of our race’s inherent blindness to White Genocide and the dangers of that blindness be a requirement of all educational initiatives.
#27 by Harumphty Dumpty on 01/17/2013 - 1:35 pm
“This phenomenon would ALMOST argue AGAINST us having our own countries.”
Wow! I never thought it through that far!
jmcaul, you rock! I loved your two comments on WGP about “naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews” too, on the thread to Beefcake #6.