I hear that when Hannity interviewed Dr. Duke, he asked, “Are you against interracial marriage?” When Dr. Duke said, “Yes,” Hannity looked shocked and said, “You really ARE a Nazi!”
Hannity considers everyone who is pro-white to be anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. But he is “right wing,” so he is regarded differently by our natural inclinations.
WRONG.
Read the Mantra. This is one reason it has to be so long. Anyone who, ACTIVELY OR PASSIVELY, subscribes to immigration and especially assimilation is joining the battle to destroy our race, and it makes no difference whether their motivation comes from the Pope, Karl Marx, or Ayn Rand.
With all these years of experience, I have discovered that only the Mantra leaves in every point that, in actual debate, we are likely to sag on. The Mantra has to be long because it hits each point the other side is likely to bring up, and it WARNS US not to sag on ANY point.
And, believe you me, the best are likely to sag on a regular basis.
We have seen Stormfront in a huge debate about whether a person must be Christian to be pro-white. Actually, the early Christian belief that the world would end soon got mixed in with degenerate Zoroastrianism and ended up making an oxymoron in our society of the words “genetic morality.”
I seem to be the only one here YET who has ever used that phrase. But heredity is more than half of life, and a set of Traditional Values that only addresses environment can be fatal and is mortally sinful.
Yet only I ever SAY that, even now.
We back down when someone talks about the blacks’ RIGHT to marry white women. But I see that you do not have any right to that which you will destroy. You are not allowed to handle museum pieces, though they are public property because you may damage them. But a black has a right to a blond wife and his seed will destroy the blondness.
It is not MORAL to let children handle precious and delicate things. But the kids MIGHT not damage them. But a black marrying a blond will DEFINITELY destroy what he says he has a right to.
Nobody else points that out.
It may be time for us to stop bitching about the Mantra and concentrate on getting our act together.
#1 by BGLass on 02/03/2012 - 10:13 am
the difference between “right” and “left” seems only in how they rationalize the exact same behaviors.
the “right” goes on about “free markets,” but this ONLY means “immigration” (with assimilation implied). For Hannity, this is South America and imo, he identifies them as “him” since he assumes they are catholic, is one rationale, as if he owns the people there, maybe.
Another is “free market,” rationale (why immigration/assimilation is good) except that he will never mention rights of foreigners to their property (seized by military or whatever), or other rights of self-determination (left to their own lives), or land grabs in the u.s. by devaluing others property, especially farmers, by “legal” means (like outlawing smelts, or tobacco crops), or various seizures for state and federal uses, “free” housing that highly incentivizes people who lived in places for years to move, the then breakup up their traditional communities, etc, etc.
“Free market” has no meaning to such ppl EXCEPT immigration/assimilation.
It is spoken of in no other context (except occasionally “attracting big business” with tax cuts).
We must “attract’ jobs when people are reduced to ‘ant colony.’ The idea of living, outside some big business being ‘governmentally attracted’ to ‘give’ a spot, is simply not thought of.
Leadership should have more sophistication (an ability to see from the point of view of a larger social context— not just their own religious and cultural positioning, or self-interest, or the perspective of their job). Like, how Romney talks about ‘being a CEO.’ What’s going on is so much broader.
#2 by Gavin on 02/03/2012 - 10:24 am
The more “right-wing” an anti-White is, the more dangerous they are. In Canada some have this weird assumption that the “Conservative” party is secretly pro-White. Their words and actions are completely anti-White and they would recoil in horror if you accused them of caring about White children or being loyal to their race. Yet the myth is that these politicians are really just scummy anti-Whites on the outside and very principled on the inside, these are POLITICIANS we are talking about!!!
I suppose that people don’t want to admit the truth to themselves that the entire system and everyone involved supports the program of genocide of our race.
The good news is that more Canadians are commenting that the “left” hate our race and the respectable conservatives are “liberals in conservatives clothing.”
#3 by ANOTHERWHITERABBIT on 02/03/2012 - 11:09 am
most people don’t care about the endagered species list and the ones that do the most fighting for these creatures seem to care more for them then humans. At all cost programs are adopted to save whatever animal this is. Most people say i cant shoot a bald eagle because it is so majestic or a bengal tiger. When will the world see White people for what we are maybe then we can get some programs to ensure our race is protected
#4 by Simmons on 02/03/2012 - 11:48 am
The Mantra gives us two eyes to see with. The rest of the people are just the blind from birth debating the color of the sunset.
We are a people becoming, the rest are a people ending.
Take the catholic cultist Thomas Fleming for instance, he insists to his followers that the words are more important than the physical existance, he has ceded the right to a physical existance of his own choosing and has it in his own head that he will be allowed to be a dissident. He is dime a dozen I just chose him for familiarity. He chooses death, his dark great grand children will hate him like Obama hates his white half. If he is lucky, some piece of trash of a humanoid will give him a Cherokee existance, “my great-great grandfather was a white man”, but I doubt it.
stay on message
#5 by Simmons on 02/03/2012 - 12:01 pm
I promise this is the last post I make besides Mantra work.
An example; The Second Amendment people have themselves pulled off a miracle, they made white women useful when they come under attack. Usually when a white woman is attacked they break down, but when they are given the moral high ground they do not break down.
The Second Amendment people have given their white women the moral high ground advantage. We at BUGs are giving white women the moral high ground advantage.
And frankly speaking we are giving everyone the moral high ground advantage. We are not debating crematory sizing, slavery, the battle of Gettysburg or the mysticism of white privilege via 10,000 word essays. We are not wild berserkers oiling our bodies and swinging our swords in front of the machine guns of the left, we are an armored attack force with potent air cover along with grenadiers of unlimited fierceness moving down on the sunken chested army of idiots known as the anti-Whites.
#6 by c-bear on 02/03/2012 - 9:04 pm
I’ve been called a “Right Wing Extremist” by liberals, and a “Communist” by Right-Wingers, among other things. Obviously I’m neither. I would have to agree with Gavin though. The left LOVES to call the right “racist”. Naturally, many who hear this from the Left, who have a healthy view of race, will gravitate towards the Right. Some escape the snare with their morals in tact. Many fall for the trap though. These people are poison. They claim a moral high-ground, and therefore are attractive towards our race. Yet what they promote is genocide. It is insidious. It is no wonder that the Right-Wing is so dangerous to our race.
#7 by Epiphany on 02/04/2012 - 3:14 am
Don’t be afraid to be called a Nazi! That is the perfect opportunity to point out that the Communists committed much of the same horrid things that the Nazis did– sending their victims to concentration camps and the like. Then, they will see the idiocy of the whole conception of the “Political Spectrum”.
#8 by BGLass on 02/04/2012 - 7:42 am
I suppose that people don’t want to admit the truth to themselves that the entire system and everyone involved supports the program of genocide of our race….”
— somehow people construe that jesus said “be in it but not of it.’ But that is impossible. That is a moral-IST, a show of the deadly sin of arrogance– not being moral, as in having morals.
They will speak of systemic “anti-racism,” but not systemic-anti-whitism.
the system creates you and you create the system, and there is no way out, and you are no better than it— that’s the bare basics of what must be seen first, if one is to have any understanding, (and regardless of one’s final conclusions about it).
without that, one is not even in the proximity of reality, unless they have tallied the system and their own contributions to it, their formation by it.
when someone says they “fight the system,” they are ‘left’ or ‘right’ (Systems Animals).
#9 by shari on 02/04/2012 - 10:27 am
BGlass, I agree. I think this is why Bob insist’s on his really, very few, but vital points. I suppose this could be called cultic, but I don’t think it is. Certainly, not now.
#10 by Scrivener on 02/04/2012 - 2:01 pm
LOL. I love it when they call me a Nazi. I literally laugh, both because it’s an easy mantra take-down AND because it’s such an obvious anti-White move.
The trouble is, as a group, the chatty anti-Whites seem to be getting more savvy and it’s much more difficult to get them to call you a racist or Nazi (or a lot of other blatant anti-White utterances that used to be standard) than it used to be.
I guess this means we’re having an effect.
#11 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 02/07/2012 - 2:31 pm
Anyone who is opposed to GENOCIDE has to be opposed to RACE MIXING!
Race mixing = Genocide
#12 by Gavin on 02/07/2012 - 4:01 pm
“Race mixing” itself is a tool of genocide that can be used against a target population.
When they flood EVERY White country and ONLY White countries with non-Whites, push race mixing propaganda in EVERY White country and ONLY White countries. The goal is obviously genocide by assimilation.