In 1959 I met a German guy who had been a member of the German National Party in the 1920s. He showed me picture of a National Party picnic with himself and Adolf Hitler standing together for a photo in front of the outdoor table.
It was a bit of a surprise, because when one thinks of Adolf Hitler, one does not picture him at a picnic.
Further, at the time the photo was taken the head of the National Socialist Party was not that big a
celebrity. In 1928, the NSDAP got one percent of the vote, while the National Party was part of the governing coalition..
By the late twenties the more respectable conservatives had taken the German government out of the hands of the socialists and communists who had taken over Bavaria and led the revolutionary group that unseated the Kaiser and surrendered.
My point is that Hitler took over because, in the 1932 election, the respectable right disappeared.
Communists and Nazis combined had a majority in the Reichstag after the 1932 election.
So the results of 2012 are not all that sure. 
In the United States, the Free Soil Party got less than one percent of the vote in 1848. Then the real parties were Democrats and Whigs. The last Whig president, Millard Fillmore, ran third in 1856 as the American Party’s nominee
By 1856 the Whigs were as dead as the Eternal Other Superpower was in 1990..
The Republicans, whose basic platform was based on Free Soil, were the second real party, and in 1860 it took over with a program that ended up making Free Soil look proslavery.
The problem is that all of this is totally novel to people who keep up with the news.
When the paycheck Whigs disappeared, they were succeeded by people who, in the context of the time, were wild extremists, “Black Republicans.”
When the paycheck right disappeared, Germany got, not socialists or communists, but Nazis. In November 1932 the world press still thought Hitler would put the Kaiser back in. Nobody, but nobody in the establishment knew more about the real NSDAP than the paid Sovietologist knew about the zombie that was their meal ticket.
Mommy Professor assures the kiddies that he knows the inevitable future. But he or she is also very aware that the horse they back keeps having a stroke.
They don’t know how to express this because the establishment is simply not made of people as smart about or as concentrated on political reality as I am.
They, like the paycheck right, are not comfortable with anyone who is smarter than they are.
They read books by people who write things to order. They elect people who are on their level. People who make wrong predictions that they like.
And they’re SCARED.
#1 by Jason on 12/29/2012 - 9:22 am
The Left is not happy like they should be. On the surface, they’ve won the whitehouse, the senate, the supreme court and have all kinds of power. But they are in a very foul mood.
Bob mentioned they are scared. I know they are hostile (even I can tell that), in a way that is not natural for winners … so there must be an underlying fear. They keep saying White people are done … finished … don’t matter. And yet they obsess over us and keeping us quiet.
The White Liberals must be slowly catching on that there is no place for them. The brown masses don’t want them as leaders. And Whites see Respectable Conservatives for what they are.
I just wish we had ANY pro-White party that was getting even 1% of the vote, that could take over when/if GOP collapses. But maybe this really is more like the USSR than America in 1850s. Any dissident voice is crushed. So, if I read my Bob right, this suppression may make the ultimate collapse of the anti-Whites even more dramatic.
#2 by BGLass on 12/29/2012 - 10:47 am
the “left” can never be happy. First they want money, sheer materialism (“Dialectical Materialism” the other name for Marxism).
After they corral money, and that doesn’t work, they decide power will make them happy!
Then they are rich with a dictatorship— but now, nobody LIKES them…and they want to be LIKED, to be perceived as GOOD, and nice, and righteous and LIKED.
—So then it’s Philanthropy. They are a Big Shot, getting a picture in the paper with legions of non-whites, opening an event for them!
Yet they don’t feel… LIKED enough!
So THEN they have to pass laws about Association. You must smile, and not say bad “bullying” things. You must not HATE, you must LIKE and appreciate me!
—So, it’s kind of an accomplishment for the “left” to work it’s way further up a food chain that Materialism didn’t even acknowledge existed. They’ve gone through money and power, and now want to be LIKED.
Laws on the books say you must LIKE US! And acknowledge our MORALITY!
#3 by Dick_Whitman on 12/29/2012 - 4:11 pm
As our victory appears more and more in reach, don’t be surprised if you see respectiCons and even liberals claim that they were with us the whole time.
In fact, many of the most heinous anti-White liberals will start to speak and act in ways that will make most White Nationalists blush.
Remember that paycheck-politicos will still want their paychecks. This is what motivates them. These types are very skilled at knowing which way the wind blows.
#4 by Jason on 12/30/2012 - 12:57 am
Bob mentioned that there is a supply and demand dimension to being a traitor as well. The supply of potential White traitors is huge – all those Respectable Conservatives (RCs) and Southern turncoats, for example.
So the rewards keep getting smaller. The future career of an RC has suddenly gotten dim. Young people entering politics must notice this. My question is, when will some risk-taking politicians start staking out pro-White turf? It’s a HUGE opportunity, but very risky at this time.
And yes, we must make sure they don’t just say things that sound nice (being for “White civil rights”) but actually continue selling us out.
My read of Bob’s articles makes me think that the racial social dynamics of the future will not be kind to “Reasonable” pro-Whites. As everything becomes more polarized, “moderates” get run over. At least that is my hope.
#5 by Jmcaul on 12/30/2012 - 8:37 pm
“And yes, we must make sure they don’t just say things that sound nice (being for “White civil rights”) but actually continue selling us out.” -Jason
In MY opinion, any politician who comes out as being for “White civil rights” is trying to buy us off. I am looking for the leader who comes out to bring an end to White genocide through prosecution and money punishment. Anything short of that is a diversion tactic as far as I am concerned.
#6 by Epiphany on 12/30/2012 - 5:18 am
The Transatlantic Slave Trade has been made the Scapegoat for the bad behavior of the Negro today. None stop to think of the fact that had it not been for the British, and other Colonial Powers, that there would not be half as many Negroes as there are now.
#7 by Jmcaul on 12/30/2012 - 8:47 pm
@Epiphany, whenever antiwhites bring up the slave trade I like to call attention to the living conditions in Africa today and then point out that the descendants of American slaves should be on their knees daily thanking whatever God there is that their ancestors were brought to America. That usually shuts them up except for the stupider ones who respond by asking for another dose of the mantra. I happily oblige.