Sam Adams had a lot to do with making the American Revolution happen, but his cousin John became president. The man who had most to do with bringing on independence (and NAMED the United States) was Thomas Paine, and he nearly starved during the war and got nothing from the United States.

Practically nobody knows who named the United States or the critical importance of Paine’s Common Sense in bringing on independence.

And another overwhelming fact about the realities of the Revolution, the American Army never again performed as well against the British, even when it had combat trained Continentals, as the Forces of Massachusetts did before Washington took over.
While many pro-whites spend a lot of energy weeping about how powerful and deeply entrenched anti-whites are, almost nobody sees what the real lesson is. BUGS has made astounding gains if, and only if, we take the reality of the sheer power of the anti-whites into account. Lots of people bemoan the power balance but almost no one sees how much we have done with so little.

I mentioned in the last article how we have changed the debate. Practically nobody starts to argue with us the way they used to, by saying “I can’t be anti-white because I’m white.”

This change is so minor nobody notices it, but it is stupendous. It means that the entire titanic power and numbers of our enemies has been affected by the Mantra.

Seeing this is critical, because if we are going to take over we are not going to measure anything by amateur means. We cannot make the mistake of measuring our power the way amateurs do.

Washington became Commander in Chief so Washington caused the Revolution and Washington won the Revolution. That is the way that the paycheck types view power politics.

If BUGSERS follow me closely they will take power and paychecks as they should.

Please note that the lesson of the American Revolution has been learned by no one, example, the last Russian Revolution. In that not a single dissident has gotten any more power or position from the Revolution they caused than did Sam Adams or Thomas Paine.

No, you will have to do less mind wandering and more disciplined thinking about what I tell you if you are to have the revolution we want. Otherwise you will follow the usual route and lose control of the results.

One remark in a traditional Oriental exchange when business men met was the standard asking about the wife: “How is the flower of your household?”

The husband would reply: “That pig is in good health.”

The whole exchange consisted of one man asking about the other and in each case one would praise the other highly and each would reply in terms which consisted of modesty gone berserk. It is considered polite to put yourself down and compliment everything about the other person.

Whenever we deal with foreign countries, it is considered polite, when all else is equal, to praise the other country.
This can be overdone. It has been overdone to the point of a fatal societal disease. That is why it is so important that we emphasize how bad treason is.

Over the years I have noted a great change in anti-white whites’ reply to the Mantra. When the Mantra began to be used, fully half of the time it was answered first with the words, “But I am white.” This reply has all but disappeared. This is an enormously important signal. It means that, even if they haven’t seen the Mantra directly, our tiny crew has had enough effect on the entire country that “anti-white” is no longer justified by “I am white.”

At the same time, it is important for us to realize that this is where this anti-white disease began. Mommy Professor makes denouncing one’s own people sound like the highest possible virtue. This is one reason I warn against “traditional values.” For almost two thousand years the highest virtue has been self-hatred and self torture. We are just now looking closely enough to notice how Christianity came to regard self-torture as a higher good than helping others.

The result has been a society which treasures self-hatred. If you don’t understand where anti-whites came from you don’t know your own history.

Probably the hardest part of Mantra in action is leaving out so much. Those without Mantra discipline are quickly put on the defensive by anti-white yells of “racism” and “ignorance.”

We, on the other hand, put the enemy in a defensive position.

More than that, we put them in a DESPERATE position.

While other pro-whites find themselves on the defensive reciting volumes of information, our opponents are desperate to change the subject with standard nonsense we refuse to deal with, and with personal insults.

But there are points that are very important for us to KNOW but which our discipline does not allow us to discuss. In the years to come, when we have progressed to the point beyond repeating the Mantra, we will have to have a basic world view.

One of these points is wordism. We simply don’t have the time during our assaults to explain that anyone who is not a nationalist or a racist is a wordist. He has given up all natural loyalties or blind loyalty to a bunch of words.

We don’t enjoy forcing our way into discussion groups on other subjects, but we have to because no one gives us a chance to discuss our subject.

A white traitor, any traitor, is far far worse than an enemy.

It bothers me when commenters go into a theory that indicates they have forgotten the basics.

These are the basics on which we must construct our world in future. That is a reason for having this page here, while the real work goes on over in the Swarm.

One of the major lessons of the 2012 and 2016 elections, (the paycheck conservatives will get a boost in 2014 and claim that whatever they did worked), will be that as a matter of arithmetic whites will have to negotiate as whites. To repeat, this is a matter of arithmetic.

The white minority will remain an overwhelming plurality. But no one can succeed in the future without seeing us a huge, self-supporting minority rather than as some sort of wordism to be imposed on everybody.

There is a great legal distinction between those who abuse children and those who do not report it.

It can be doubted whether there is a moral distinction.

Anti-whites only talk about one accusation of genocide. In the case of the Holocaust they constantly denounce what they call “the good Germans,” Germans who they say knew about a mass slaughter of Jews but did not openly object to it.

But there is a huge difference between Good Germans then and Good Whites now, even if all the assumptions are true. Being a Bad German would have been suicide and would have had no effect. The implicit claim here is that today’s brave anti-whites would have defied Hitler and the SS.

Good Whites today are in an entirely different category. They are the people who refuse to mention child abuse. They are the ones who complain about our shoving white genocide onto all their fun sites while knowing full well that we are forcefully prevented from arguing our case elsewhere.

There are plenty of Good Germans today. They refuse to object to laws that make it a felony to offend political correctness. Today’s Good Germans could quite legally do what Rowan Atkinson and Paul Fromm and many others have done.

In Nazi Germany a free speech movement would have been grounds for arrest. If the old Germans were evil, then the Good Canadian, the Good French, the Good British and all the rest of modern Good Guys have wiped out even the theoretical distinction between those who commit crimes and those who refuse to acknowledge them.

Jason commented on my article “Why Do Those Who Benefit From the Mantra Attack It?

JASON says: “Everyone commented on how Horus’s optimism sparked their interest in the Mantra. None of the groups mentioned are optimistic. I still visit those sites, but none of them have ANY agenda that I can see.”

“That ties into the lack of optimism. They aren’t pushing for anything”.

“Pro-Whites will eventually benefit from what we are doing, but it may not be those groups. It will probably be an entirely new set of leaders.”

“Was there a parallel in the USSR? Were there dissidents who were against the use of propaganda pamphlets? What happened to them?”

Since the media has forgotten the fall of the USSR, and I am one of the few Americans who dealt with samizdat, I’ll try an answer.

The publishers of samizdat (It means “self-publication,” a crime in the USSR where all private production, especially of information, was outlawed) were astonished that, when the USSR failed, so did their own publications.

They soon realized that they were publishing illegal goods, and whatever they wrote would be bought on the black market. But when the press became free, they had no experience competing in the open market.

The Party hacks turned Pravda into a saleable publication. They even included one of MY articles, since I was a professional writer with experience. The idea that PRAVDA would have a Bob Whitaker article really blew my mind!

Also it was the Party hacks like Putin who took over in the power vacuum, not the dissidents, except for Walesa in Poland. Walesa had already had some practical political experience.

So, as usual, Jason’s question hits an important point. In order to succeed in a power struggle you have to have some experience with power struggle. And to succeed in a writer’s competitive market requires more than only black market experience.

That is why Sam Adams had so much to do causing the American Revolution, but it was his second cousin John who became president.

JASON SAYS:

“Is there more than one kind of silence? Sometimes, a group of people will remain silent, but the moment somebody speaks out, the ice is broken and they all start speaking the some obvious truth.

Other times, they cower in fear when someone speaks a truth everyone finds inconvenient. Or they may actually attack the truth-teller. The taboo must be maintained! It’s as if they believe some angry god will punish them all for saying blasphemous words. They have seen the “white racist” destroyed too many times in real life and in media images. This is one advantage we have with a MESSAGE focus as opposed to a PERSONALITY focus. Any single person can be destroyed. But a message is hard to stop.

Whites are seeing the Mantra message everywhere, every day. They see that the anti-Whites cannot answer it and cannot suppress it. That itself is powerful. It shows that the anti-White gods are not so powerful after all.

Once the anti-White gods are seen as paper tigers, an ocean of pent-up passion will be unleashed. This is why it is critical that as many posts, flyers, videos and whatever other form the Mantra can come in be produced and put out there for Whites to see – in virtually every venue imaginable. They will see that the taboo can be broken and the world doesn’t end.
And then they will get the courage to do it themselves”.

I would say that the answer to “Why shouldn’t they marry if they want to” would be to stay on the attack:

“You are saying that this whole program of immigration and assimilation and chasing down every white on earth who wants to live in a white community is just for True Love?”

Any other approach is tailgating.

One of the main bulwarks every tyranny uses in banning all dissent is “The dissent itself may be all right, but it may lead to…”

For once, the warnings of all the despots, Stalin, Hitler, and the anti-whites, are perfectly true. Dissent can lead to more dissent. Communists always say they brook no disagreement because disagreement can lead to fascism. Putin’s one-man rule could fall within the very loose limits of the screamed “fascist!” definition.

After all, no one asks for a definition of “fascism” any more than anyone dares ask for a definition of racism.

The tyrants always say that freedom is dangerous. They are perfectly correct. “Freedom” which involves no risk is not freedom. It takes no courage to ask for a “freedom” which involves no risks. A slave has “rights” as long as they involve no risks to their masters’ property.

This truth makes it particularly ironic that there should be a low-key campaign on the part of other pro-whites to undermine the Mantra.

The fact is that anti-whites are right about what the Mantra may lead to. They warn that spreading the Mantra will lead to the public taking a second look at all pro-whites. If the Mantra gets a toehold, it will not be enough to just scream “racist” at David Duke or Stormfront or The Occidental Quarterly.

One who hears the Mantra is likely, in the long or short run, to take a new look at all pro-whites.

The old screams and labels are weakened by the Mantra every time anyone hears it.

Why are those who will reap such benefits constantly denouncing us?