Archive for December, 2012

A Gem From Old Blighty

I’ve been posting around Youtube as usual. Returned to the Duluth link to find Avro’s response to the Duluth billboard slogan, “It’s hard to see racism when you’re white”:

“Its hard to see White GENOCIDE, when you are anti-White.”

Photobucket

Solid gold!

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

8 Comments

Anti-Whites Stole Hitler’s Genocide, Now They’re Stealing his Lebensraum

From the beginning, as I warned people, anti-whites would avoid answering the Mantra by waiting awhile and then declaring, “But we ALREADY answered it!”

Lord Nelson can probably remember when I warned you about THAT one.

Sure enough, a whole slew of new anti-whites are trying that same old gambit, “We debunked the Mantra!”

One person attacks the Mantra and proclaims himself the winner.

Usually when one debates with himself and declares himself the winner they put him somewhere calm and give him stuff.

There are two techniques anti-whites use when they are talking to themselves. Both were practiced by the naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews they label us.Photobucket

First there is the “Whites DESERVE the genocide we are practicing.” This is a series of quotes from Mommy Professor which talks about Whites in EXACTLY the same terms Hitler spoke of Jews: The white man is the root of all evil and has never done anything good.

This panics the TOO types but we just point out that that is the same technique Hitler’s speeches used.

The second anti-white technique is also straight out of Mein Kampf. This is the Lebensraum argument. It says that if Whites do not completely fill up their Lebensraum for a generation, it becomes Lebensraum for others.

And it’s GOOD for us! All those old age benefits we old folks dumped on ourselves will disappear if WE have to pay for them and leave few descendants to do so.

They don’t mention why we must assimilate to give away all that Lebensraum. Assimilation is not giving up Lebensraum. Assimilation is 100% racial.

Assimilation is for ALL white countries and ONLY white countries

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

30 Comments

No Piggy Backing!

We have developed our own terminology. One who has not been out on the web fighting wouldn’t understand it easily, if at all. One term we have developed nicely is “tailgating.”

Let me add a new one.

As comments on South African Genocide come in, I feel uneasy. Compared to tiny BUGS, outrage about the outright killing of Boers is enormous.

Well, compared to active BUGSERS, just about anything is enormous.

The message of BUGS is that white genocide is nonviolent. That is a hard sell. So it is MUCH easier to go with the tide and talk about the actual killing of whites. And this is exactly the kind of slippery slope it takes constant vigilance to avoid.Photobucket

We find that things get much easier when we abandon assimilation and just piggy back on the anti-immigration movement. We will find things begin to go easier as we piggy back on South African genocide because there is actual killing involved. It saves us the enormous effort of getting across the reality that the real program of white genocide goes under the Guise of Peace and Justice.

When you piggyback things become far easier.

BEWARE when it gets easy!

Dr. Duke has developed a nice salable package which declares that he is preserving ALL races.

That’s a piggyback.

Nobody, least of all somebody of David’s intelligence, believes there is the slightest threat to the existence of any ethnic group except whites. And even if there were, it isn’t MY business.

The only reason for this fake concern is to piggy back on all the loud Peace and Freedom and Universal Concern preached everywhere all the time.

To me, this is straight piggybacking.

Piggy backing is a great way to raise membership and a great way to raise funds. I have a great pension from my years of piggybacking on conservatism.

The best way to avoid piggy backing is to realize that if it gets easy, you’re almost certainly doing something wrong.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

31 Comments

Institution is a Tricky Word

Back around 1960, the words “car rental” and the name Hertz were as identical in the public mind as was “refrigerator” and Frigidaire” or “ soft drink” and “Coke.” Robert Townsend the guy who made Avis into a real competitor to Hertz was, therefore, a genius.

Like your genius, Bob, the man at Avis had a few simple guidelines, which he wrote down in a short bestseller called “Up the Organization.”

He warned of the what I call “institutionalization.” In industry it is known as “going a little bit public.”

A closed corporation will often put some of its stock on a stock exchange because the value of this openly sold stock sets a value on all of its stock that a bank can use as the basis of loans and the corporation can use as a basis for giving “fair value” when one of the owners has to be bought out. This can be useful.Photobucket

But Townsend warned against it. He said that people said they were issuing a few public shares to “set the value,” but it in the real world, it doesn’t stop at that.

Theoretically putting ten percent of the shares on the market would attract the highest bidders only: Less supply for the highest demand.

The problem is, says Townsend, PEOPLE mess this logic up. Very soon the only public evaluation of their stocks, the little bit out there in public, becomes the decision-maker. Previously the Board made its choices only in view of the long term goals the corporation was aiming for. Now, every time there is a decision, it is made in public and the shares react.

It doesn’t matter if it is one percent or ten percent of the shares, every meeting is now concerned with the public reaction rather than the goals only the company management knows it is pursuing. He could not have done what he needed to do at Avis if it had been “a little bit public.”

When I say “institution” one normally thinks of a Hudson Institute or the United States Senate. But an institution can be just “a little bit public.”

When Dave explained his problem with our White Genocide approach, he was speaking as someone who has built up an organization. That is a lifelong job which he and Don have done. Please note that Townsend would consider you a bit crazy if you interpreted him as saying, “Going a little public makes the Director into Evil, Greedy nutcases, probably JEWS.”

An institution simply forces one to have a different imperative from someone who has no institution.

This put Dave into a bad position. He and Don must decide what to do with their organizations. BUGS would not be here if it weren’t for Stormfront.

In fact, Dave’s personal fame is an institution in itself.

In other words, with a little bit of thinking one can figure out where people are coming from without deciding they are Evil or Jews or Traitors.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

27 Comments

Congratulations, Horus!

Facebook now has a new cause, a site called “Stop the White Rabbit!”

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Stop-White-Rabbit-Radio/361225900561570

The only problem is that they ascribe The White Rabbit to Bob Whitaker. I wish I COULD take the credit!

But no one expects anti-whites to get their facts straight.

Like The Occidental Quarterly, a number of commenters tell everyone how to take apart these Mantra people. Which is serious doo-doo to TOOs and “Stop the White Rabbit” types, but hilarious to those of us who have been tearing anti-white’s wings off very time. Photobucket

Anti-whites can do nothing but wait for their Thought Police to arrive and censor us out, as the very title of this page shows.

So AMPWs, Anti-Mantra Pro-Whites now have a set of allies. Just as respectable conservative is the Beloved Little Brother of the “Progressives,” now that the illusions of respectable conservative supporters are finally, slowly beginning to break apart in electoral reality, a new “opposition” will be needed..

He doesn’t realize it, but Jared has an excellent chance to be the new William Buckley. Only a professional would probably notice, but I can see the real barrier to him is that he does not have the underlying dishonesty and the Catholic-Southern inferiority complexes that were so obvious in Buckley.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

7 Comments